midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
136 F.4th 415
2d Cir.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Julia Soussis filed multiple Chapter 13 bankruptcy petitions to prevent foreclosure of her residence, with the most recent filed in May 2019.
  • Soussis made $362,100 in pre-confirmation payments to the standing trustee as required by bankruptcy law, but never had a repayment plan confirmed by the court.
  • After moving to dismiss her case before confirmation, the trustee returned most of the funds to Soussis but retained $20,592 (5.7%) as his statutory percentage fee.
  • Soussis sought disgorgement of the fee, arguing that the trustee must return all pre-confirmation payments if no plan is confirmed.
  • Both the Bankruptcy Court and District Court ruled for the trustee, allowing retention of the fee; Soussis appealed to the Circuit Court.
  • The appellate court reviewed the legal issue de novo, focusing on interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 1326 and 28 U.S.C. § 586.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Can a Chapter 13 standing trustee retain the percentage fee from pre-confirmation payments if the plan is not confirmed? Soussis: Trustee must return all pre-confirmation payments, including the percentage fee, if the plan is not confirmed, as per Section 1326(a)(2). Trustees: Section 586(e)(2) requires collection and retention of the fee from all payments received under proposed plans, regardless of confirmation. The trustee must return all pre-confirmation payments, including the fee, if the plan is not confirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. 510 (2015) (explains that pre-confirmation payments must be returned if a plan is not confirmed).
  • Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 596 U.S. 464 (2022) (discusses structure and role of standing trustees in bankruptcy proceedings).
  • Marshall v. Johnson, 100 F.4th 914 (7th Cir. 2024) (Circuit split favoring return of trustee fees absent confirmation).
  • Matter of Evans, 69 F.4th 1101 (9th Cir. 2023) (trustee must return percentage fee if no plan is confirmed).
  • In re Doll, 57 F.4th 1129 (10th Cir. 2023) (same holding on return of trustee fees in failed Chapter 13 cases).
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Soussis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 9, 2025
Citations: 136 F.4th 415; 22-155
Docket Number: 22-155
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In
    In Re: Soussis, 136 F.4th 415