History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Sonja Ritter
NC-17-1001-FBJu
9th Cir. BAP
Aug 8, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor Sonja Ritter filed Chapter 7 and owned a home valued at $185,000 with a first mortgage held by Bank of America for $297,229 and a second mortgage held by PNC Bank for $42,416.
  • Ritter filed a motion to avoid PNC’s junior lien under § 506, asserting the senior lien exceeded the property value, and submitted a proposed order.
  • The bankruptcy court granted Ritter a discharge, closed the case, and did not rule on the motion to avoid PNC’s lien or sign the proposed order.
  • Over three years later, Ritter moved to reopen the case to obtain the previously submitted order avoiding PNC’s lien; the bankruptcy court denied the motion as futile.
  • The court held that, under controlling Supreme Court precedent, a Chapter 7 debtor cannot strip a wholly underwater junior mortgage lien under § 506(d); Ritter’s motion for reconsideration was also denied.
  • Ritter appealed the denial of reopening and reconsideration; the BAP affirmed, concluding reopening would be futile because Caulkett and Dewsnup foreclose the requested relief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by denying Ritter’s motion to reopen and reconsideration so she could avoid PNC’s junior mortgage lien Ritter: Her unopposed 2013 motion to avoid the junior lien should have been granted; court should reopen and sign the submitted order Trustee/BAP: Even if reopened, controlling Supreme Court precedent forbids stripping a wholly underwater junior lien in Chapter 7; motion is legally meritless Denial affirmed: reopening would be futile because Caulkett (and Dewsnup) preclude voiding a junior lien where the senior lien exceeds collateral value

Key Cases Cited

  • Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett, 135 S. Ct. 1995 (2015) (Supreme Court holds Chapter 7 debtors may not void a junior mortgage lien under § 506(d) when a senior lien exceeds collateral value)
  • Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992) (Supreme Court precedent interpreted to prohibit strip-off of wholly underwater junior liens in Chapter 7)
  • Beezley v. California Land Title Co., 994 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir. 1993) (court may decline to reopen bankruptcy where relief sought is pointless)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Sonja Ritter
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 8, 2017
Docket Number: NC-17-1001-FBJu
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir. BAP