History
  • No items yet
midpage
351 S.W.3d 25
Mo. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Guardianship/conservatorship for A.C. Smith; daughter petitioned for guardian/conservator and emergency temporary appointments.
  • Smith did not attend hearings; attorney stated health issues made attendance inadvisable.
  • Court temporarily appointed public administrator as guardian/conservator pendente lite for 60 days after January 15, 2009 hearing.
  • Smith later received proper service and attended/executed hearings; on April 9, court found incapacitated and appointed public administrator as guardian/conservator by stipulation.
  • Lang, acting “on behalf of” Smith, moved to dismiss and set aside orders; Smith died during the appeal, creating mootness.
  • Court dismissed the appeal as moot, holding temporary orders expired and authority ended at death; jurisdictional arguments rejected.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the appeal is moot after Smith's death Lang argues issues survive death as jurisdictional. Smith/Davis contends mootness upon death ends authority and appeal. Appeal is moot; death terminates guardian/conservator authority and orders.
Whether challenges to temporary orders are reviewable Temp letters/appoint ments should be reviewable despite death. Temporary orders expire and are superseded by later letters. Temporary orders moot and not subject to review.
Whether statutory prerequisites are jurisdictional defects § 475.075 compliance is jurisdictional. Statutory preconditions are not jurisdictional per J.C.W. ex rel. Webb v. Wyciskalla. Statutory requirements are not jurisdictional; concerns are non-jurisdictional.

Key Cases Cited

  • Estate of Pfaff v. Pfaff, 746 S.W.2d 636 (Mo.App.1988) (temporary letters superseded by later letters; not reviewable on appeal)
  • In re S.L.C., 330 S.W.3d 517 (Mo.App.2010) (temporary appointments expire; not reviewable on appeal)
  • J.C.W. ex rel. Webb v. Wyciskalla, 275 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. banc 2009) (statutory compliance not jurisdictional)
  • State ex rel. Reed v. Reardon, 41 S.W.3d 470 (Mo. banc 2001) (threshold mootness inquiry in appellate review)
  • Murray v. Hunter, 321 S.W.3d 447 (Mo.App. 2010) (mootness; limitations on review of interlocutory issues)
  • State v. Parkinson, 280 S.W.3d 70 (Mo. banc 2009) (jurisdictional analysis; separation of powers)
  • State v. Fassero, 256 S.W.3d 109 (Mo. banc 2008) (claims raised at first opportunity; waived if not)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Smith
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 15, 2011
Citations: 351 S.W.3d 25; 2011 WL 3566864; SD 30524
Docket Number: SD 30524
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In
    In Re Smith, 351 S.W.3d 25