History
  • No items yet
midpage
312 Ga. App. 180
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • In DeKalb County, DFCS filed deprivation petitions alleging four children deprived due to father’s sexual abuse of S.B. and T.B. and mother’s failure to protect.
  • S.B., age 13, disclosed to a friend at school that her father forced her to have sex with him; disclosure supported by counselor and DFCS.
  • S.B. also stated mother witnessed sexual intercourse and did nothing to stop it; mother admitted the same to DFCS.
  • T.B., age 14, testified about punishment involving removal of clothes and touching, while not alleging ongoing abuse by father.
  • The father admitted to sexual intercourse with S.B. and to commanding T.B. to undress on one occasion, later recanting; both parents invoked Fifth Amendment at hearing.
  • The juvenile court found all four children deprived on November 18, 2009, and order affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether clear and convincing evidence supports deprivation Ka. B. argues insufficient evidence to deprive Ka. B. asserts lack of corroborating signs and credibility concerns Evidence supported deprivation
Whether all four children were deprived Mother’s failure to protect and father’s abuse extended to siblings Lack of direct evidence on Ke. B. and Ka. B. of deprivation All four children deprived
Whether denial of motion to dismiss was proper Deprivation findings based on DFCS's credible evidence Insufficient evidence to sustain deprivation Motion to dismiss properly denied
Whether deprivation order lacked required findings of fact Order sufficiently linked deprivation to abuse and failure to protect Order deficient for missing explicit findings Order adequate and compliant with OCGA 15-11-54(a)

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Interest of T.W., 297 Ga.App. 886, 678 S.E.2d 546 (Ga. App. 2009) (credibility and weighing of evidence in deprivation cases)
  • In the Interest of A.A., 293 Ga.App. 471, 667 S.E.2d 641 (Ga. App. 2008) (parent may plead Fifth Amendment, court may infer harmful truth)
  • In the Interest of M.K., 288 Ga.App. 71, 653 S.E.2d 354 (Ga. App. 2007) (standard for child deprivation credibility evidence)
  • In the Interest of C.A.L., 307 Ga.App. 658, 705 S.E.2d 885 (Ga. App. 2011) (child's testimony can establish deprivation)
  • In the Interest of B.H., 295 Ga.App. 297, 671 S.E.2d 303 (Ga. App. 2008) (admission of abuse evidence supports deprivation finding)
  • In the Interest of E.D., 287 Ga.App. 152, 650 S.E.2d 800 (Ga. App. 2007) (judgment may rely on indirect effects of parental conduct)
  • In the Interest of J.V., 241 Ga.App. 621, 526 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. App. 1999) (OCGA findings requisite after deprivation hearing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Sb
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 20, 2011
Citations: 312 Ga. App. 180; 718 S.E.2d 49; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3270; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 914; A11A1224
Docket Number: A11A1224
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In