History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re S.E.
2013 Ohio 5057
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Father (N.R.) filed to establish paternity of an infant and child-support was set after a magistrate’s hearing. Mother (N.E.) was awarded legal custody; Father received parenting time.
  • Father has a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering (2006) but has no employment history in that field; from 2006–2009 he did not work, and from 2009–2012 he did part-time, self-employed web‑design work with gross earnings of about $6,500–$8,500 annually.
  • At the hearing Father testified he had applied to a “couple places,” believed computer-engineer pay in the Dayton area ranged from $15–$50/hour, and was seeking full‑time work but had not held an engineering job.
  • The magistrate found Father voluntarily underemployed and imputed full‑time income of $25/hour ($52,000/year) for child‑support calculation.
  • The trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision; Father appealed, arguing the underemployment finding and the $25/hour imputation were an abuse of discretion. Mother did not file an appellate brief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Father) Defendant's Argument (Mother/Trial Court) Held
Whether Father was voluntarily underemployed He was working (self‑employed) and had tried to find jobs in his field; he never held an engineering job so cannot be deemed voluntarily underemployed Father has a degree and no substantial full‑time work history; he applied only a few places, so court may find voluntary underemployment Court: No abuse of discretion — Father was voluntarily underemployed
Whether imputing income at $25/hour was proper The $25/hour figure is unsupported; Father never earned that, his wage estimate was a guess, and the local market is poor Trial court relied on Father’s testimony about wage range and his degree/experience to select a reasonable mid‑range figure Court: Abuse of discretion in selecting $25/hour because no evidentiary basis for that specific figure; remanded to impute $15/hour (the bottom of Father’s stated range)

Key Cases Cited

  • Rock v. Cabral, 67 Ohio St.3d 108 (1993) (abuse‑of‑discretion review applies to imputation of income and voluntary underemployment determinations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re S.E.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 15, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 5057
Docket Number: 25743
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.