In re Ruby G. Owen Trust
2012 Ark. App. 381
| Ark. Ct. App. | 2012Background
- PBNB sought court consent to modify the Ruby G. Owen Trust into a special-needs trust to qualify Kristian for public benefits.
- Kristian Owen, granddaughter of Ruby Owen, is a resident of Alaska and was diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2010; a guardian was appointed.
- Ruby Owen died in April 2010, one month after creating the trust.
- June 2011, PBNB as successor trustee filed petition for modification; hearing held, post-hearing brief submitted.
- September 21, 2011, trial court declined the modification citing public-policy against sequestration of resources for Medicaid; PBNB appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether modification is permissible under Arkansas law | PBNB argues statutory authority for equitable deviation allows modification. | Court should enforce public policy against using trusts to sequester assets for government benefits. | Affirmed; modification not allowed. |
| Whether Alaska law should govern the analysis | Alaska law should govern due to beneficiary residence and benefits-related issues. | Arkansas law should apply since the matter involves Arkansas trust law. | We declined to address Alaska-law argument. |
| Whether the modification would be void as contrary to Arkansas public policy | Modification would respect grantor intent and provide general family benefit. | Modification risks sequestering assets to obtain public benefits, violating public policy. | Modification would be void; court affirmed denial. |
Key Cases Cited
- Thomas v. Ark. Dept. of Human Servs., 319 Ark. 782 (Ark. 1995) (trusts may not be used to qualify for Medicaid via resource sequestration)
- Ark. Dept. of Human Servs. v. Donis, 280 Ark. 169 (Ark. 1983) (trust funds remain accessible and affect eligibility for benefits)
- Riddell Testamentary Trust, 157 P.3d 892 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007) (supersedes state limitations; focus on settlor intent and equitable deviation)
- Winchel v. Craig, 55 Ark.App. 378 (Ark. App. 1996) (equity jurisdiction and de novo review in trust matters)
