midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
202 So. 3d 177
La. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • S&D Roofing, LLC (members Shane Dufrene and David Cain) was formed in 2005; both were registered agents.
  • Jefferson contracted with S&D in 2006 and sued for breach of contract in 2009; Cain was served with the petition in Jan. 2010; Dufrene was not.
  • Jefferson obtained a default judgment against S&D on April 16, 2010; notice of that judgment was not perfected on the LLC prior to dissolution.
  • Cain and Dufrene filed an affidavit dissolving S&D on November 30, 2010 under La. R.S. 12:1335.1, which made them personally liable for LLC claims.
  • Cain and Dufrene later learned of the default judgment in 2011; they sought reinstatement of the LLC and requested retroactive reinstatement to perfect service and enable representation.
  • The district court ordered reinstatement prospectively only (effective on the date of the court’s order); S&D appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether reinstatement of an LLC under La. R.S. 12:1335.1 may be given retroactive effect Retroactive reinstatement is necessary to perfect service of the April 2010 default judgment and to facilitate proper legal representation of the LLC The statute is silent on retroactivity and public policy disfavors retroactive reinstatement that would prejudice third parties or shield members from personal liability Reinstatement under La. R.S. 12:1335.1 is prospective only; court affirmed district court’s prospective-only reinstatement

Key Cases Cited

  • Robertson v. Weinmann, 782 So.2d 38 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2001) (reinstatement under statute silent on retroactivity should be prospective; public policy favors reliance on dissolution)
  • In re Reinstatement of Venture Assocs., 906 So.2d 498 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2005) (retroactive reinstatement allowed to preserve a pending suit brought by the corporation)
  • In re Islander Shipholding, 715 So.2d 7 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1998) (retroactive reinstatement approved to facilitate arbitration where liquidation/dissolution procedures caused the issue)
  • Airline Skate Ctr., Inc. v. Lockett, 759 So.2d 813 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1999) (reinstatement does not shield shareholders from personal liability when they dissolved the corporation knowing debts existed)
  • Butcher v. Keith Hebert Carpentry/Vinyl Siding, Inc., 945 So.2d 914 (La. App. 3 Cir. 2006) (reinstatement to resolve pending litigation is proper but does not absolve personal liability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Reinstatement of S&D Roofing, LLC
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 22, 2016
Citations: 202 So. 3d 177; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1741; 16 La.App. 5 Cir. 85; No. 16-CA-85
Docket Number: No. 16-CA-85
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In