In Re Rcy, 27 A.3d 227

Appellant, a minor, stole his uncle's unregistered and uninsured Honda Civic and drove with a learner's permit, no valid license.
He fled after being observed disobeying stop signs and signaling a turn, prompting police to pursue.
During the chase, he repeatedly ran stop signs, damaged property, and attempted to flee by parking and revving the engine in snow.
Officers boxed the vehicle; Appellant struck a squad car and an officer, then fled as the officer broke the driver's window to intervene.
The chase ended on a public street when the vehicle stalled and Appellant was apprehended; he was charged with fleeing/eluding, among other offenses.
The juvenile court adjudicated delinquency on the fleeing/eluding charge and, after dispositional orders and dismissals of remaining charges, the case was appealed focused on the § 3733(a.2)(2) enhancement.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Whether 'high-speed chase' in § 3733(a.2)(2)(iii) requires excessive speed	R.C.Y. argues no high-speed chase; speed not exceeding 35 mph.	Commonwealth contends the term is a flexible standard reflecting dangerous conduct, not a numeric speed.	Yes; the term is not literal speed but a danger-based standard to be applied by courts.

In re T.B., 11 A.3d 500 (Pa.Super. 2010) (standard for sufficiency of evidence and appellate review in delinquency cases)
Commonwealth v. Driscoll, 485 Pa. 99, 401 A.2d 312 (Pa. 1979) (penal provisions shall be strictly construed)