History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Rb
309 Ga. App. 407
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother of 15-month-old R.B. appeals a deprivation finding and nonreunification plan approved by the Cobb County Juvenile Court.
  • DFCS petitioned for deprivation after earlier termination of the mother's rights to four older children in 2008 due to abuse/neglect and poor parental fitness.
  • R.B. was born December 24, 2009; DFCS obtained emergency custody December 28, 2009.
  • At adjudication, a psychologist opined the mother has borderline intellectual functioning, poor communication, and inability to apply parenting skills; concerns about future care persist.
  • Putative father testified to domestic violence by the mother; DNA later showed he was not R.B.’s biological father, he withdrew his petition to legitimate.
  • The juvenile court found R.B. deprived and that reunification would be detrimental; the venue was Cobb County, where DFCS had custody.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for deprivation Mother argues evidence relied only on prior termination and not current deprivation. DFCS contends current conditions and past conduct show ongoing deprivation. Sufficient clear and convincing evidence supported deprivation.
Venue for deprivation proceedings Mother contends Cobb County not proper venue. DFCS argues statute permits venue where child resides or is present; R.B. remained with Cobb DFCS. Venue properly Cobb County.

Key Cases Cited

  • In the Interest of R.M., 276 Ga.App. 707 (2005) (deprivation standards; weight given to past conduct and parental unfitness)
  • In the Interest of A.R., 287 Ga.App. 334 (2007) (reaffirms consideration of past conduct and future likelihood of deprivation)
  • In the Interest of T.V., 302 Ga.App. 124 (2010) (current deprivation may be shown when conditions still exist)
  • In the Interest of C.H., 305 Ga.App. 549 (2010) (analysis of whether deprivation would persist if returned to parent)
  • In the Interest of Z.H.T., 302 Ga.App. 424 (2010) (current deprivation may be shown by existing conditions)
  • In the Interest of R.J.D.B., 305 Ga.App. 888 (2010) (credibility and weight given to parental promises are for the trial court)
  • In the Interest of CP., 291 Ga.App. 699 (2008) (reunification services not required where timely detriment shown)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Rb
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 22, 2011
Citation: 309 Ga. App. 407
Docket Number: A11A0233
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.