History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Rahim
442 B.R. 578
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors’ aggregate income exceeds $509,000 annually after imputed vehicle payments and support payments not disclosed in Schedule I/J.
  • Debtors’ Schedule I shows $39,400 monthly from medical practice; additional $2,046 monthly vehicle payments and $1,000 monthly niece support are undisclosed.
  • Total monthly expenses are disclosed at $39,380 on Schedule J, but actual expenses are at least $42,426 due to undisclosed items and withdrawals from the medical practice.
  • Debtors’ Schedule D lists secured debts of $3,417,423; Schedule F lists unsecured claims of $6,671,939, primarily guaranties of Florida real estate investments.
  • Court finds the case filed in bad faith under 11 U.S.C. § 707(a) given lavish lifestyle and lack of effort to reduce expenses, with potential avoidance of a meaningful dividend to creditors through Chapter 11 as a more appropriate path.
  • Trustee notes substantial assets possible for administration, but Chapter 11 would yield larger distributions than Chapter 7, and this does not undermine the finding of cause to dismiss.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether debtors qualify for Chapter 7 relief given income and expenses. Rahim and Abdulhussain argue expenses negate need for Chapter 7. Rahim/Abdulhussain argue income/expenses do not support dismissal under 707(a). No; court finds lack of good faith and cause to dismiss.
Whether there is “cause” to dismiss under 11 U.S.C. § 707(a). Debtors contend no cause due to business debts; 707(a) not limited to consumer cases. Court should consider ability to pay and lavish expenses as cause. There is cause to dismiss under § 707(a).

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124 (6th Cir.1991) (lack of good faith can justify dismissal; not limited to § 707(b))
  • In re Krohn, 886 F.2d 123 (6th Cir.1989) (ability to repay debt from future earnings can support dismissal for neediness)
  • Perlin v. Hitachi Capital Am. Corp., 497 F.3d 364 (3d Cir.2007) (income/expense factors under 707(a) are not constrained to § 707(b) and cannot solely determine bad faith)
  • Local Loan Co. v. Hunt, 292 U.S. 234 (1934) (bankruptcy for the honest but unfortunate debtor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Rahim
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Date Published: Dec 16, 2010
Citation: 442 B.R. 578
Docket Number: 19-42911
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. E.D. Mich.