History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re R.T.A.
2012 Ohio 5080
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • CSEA appeals the trial court's sua sponte dismissal of its contempt finding against Peck for failure to pay court-ordered child support.
  • A July 2011 contempt hearing resulted in a magistrate's entry finding contempt, imposing a suspended sentence with purge conditions and a purge review set for April 11, 2012.
  • The court adopted the magistrate's decision with an August 16, 2011 journal entry reflecting the contempt and purge framework.
  • At the April 11, 2012 purge review, the court was informed Peck had satisfied purge requirements and a wage attachment was in place; the court stated the cases with Peck purged and vacated the August 16, 2011 contempt order.
  • CSEA criticized the court's sua sponte vacatur as unauthorized; Peck had purged the contempt, but the trial court's authority to vacate its own final contempt order without motion under Civ.R. 60(B) was disputed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May the court sua sponte vacate a final contempt order? Peck's contempt order was final; vacatur without motion was unauthorized. Court could vacate based on purge satisfaction when appropriate to adjust proceedings. Court lacked authority to sua sponte vacate the final contempt order.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dickerson v. Cleveland Metro. Hous. Auth., 8th Dist. No. 96726, 2011-Ohio-6437 (8th Dist. 2011) (finality of contempt orders and permissible vacatur limits)
  • Rice v. Bethel Assoc., Inc., 35 Ohio App.3d 133, 520 N.E.2d 26 (9th Dist.1987) (9th Dist. 1987) (Civ.R. 60(B) exclusive means to vacate final judgments)
  • State v. Carlisle, 121 Ohio St.3d 127, 2011-Ohio-6553, 961 N.E.2d 671 (Ohio Supreme Court 2011) (absent statutory authority, cannot modify criminal sentences by reconsidering final judgments)
  • McCrea v. McCrea, 8th Dist. No. 51324, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 9138 (8th Dist. 1986) (contempt order final where applicable despite purge terms)
  • Jacobson v. Starkoff, 8th Dist. No. 80850, 2002-Ohio-7 (8th Dist. 2002) (contempt order final when penalty imposed; purge affects finality)
  • Chain Bike v. Spoke N’ Wheel, Inc., 64 Ohio App.2d 62, 410 N.E.2d 802 (8th Dist.1979) (8th Dist. 1979) (contempt order final where penalty imposed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re R.T.A.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 1, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 5080
Docket Number: 98498
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.