History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Pike Family Trusts
38 A.3d 329
Me.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Clifton died in 2003 and Doris died in 2007; Clifton's will created a spendthrift family trust for his wife and children.
  • Doris's estate was not funded and remained separate; Clifton's trust’s main asset is an apartment building.
  • Doris appointed Buhrman as independent trustee after the bank declined to serve; Doris did not exercise the power of appointment.
  • Joyce and Elaine petitioned to combine the trusts, fund Doris’s estate into Clifton’s trust, and terminate the trusts; Buhrman opposed except to consolidate assets.
  • The probate court granted the petition; Buhrman appeals, arguing the spendthrift clause prevents termination; issue centers on spendthrift provisions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the spendthrift clause preclude termination? Buhrman argues yes; spendthrift is a material purpose. Joyce/Elaine argue no; removal of spendthrift presumption allows termination. No; spendthrift is not a material purpose to prevent termination.
May trusts be combined and Doris’s estate transferred under the relevant code sections? Buhrman contends termination defeats settlor’s intent. Petitioners seek to consolidate and terminate with consent of beneficiaries. Authorized if continuance not necessary to achieve trust purposes and all beneficiaries consent.
Is spendthrift a material purpose under §411(3) after 2005 UTC changes? Yes; presumption persists without explicit showing. No; §411(3) rejects presumption of material purpose. Buhrman failed to prove spendthrift was a material purpose.

Key Cases Cited

  • University of Maine Found. v. Fleet Bank of Me., 817 A.2d 871 (Me. 2003) (holding spendthrift not presumed to be a material purpose prior to UTC adoption)
  • White v. Fleet Bank of Me., 875 A.2d 680 (Me. 2005) (trusts may be terminated when purposes accomplished and all beneficiaries consent)
  • Estate of Silsby, 914 A.2d 703 (Me. 2006) (interpretation of wills and extrinsic evidence considerations)
  • Guardianship of Jewel M., 2 A.3d 301 (Me. 2010) (judicial notice and records in related cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Pike Family Trusts
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jan 24, 2012
Citation: 38 A.3d 329
Court Abbreviation: Me.