838 N.W.2d 226
Neb.2013Background
- Petitioner, a pregnant 16-year-old, seeks abortion without parental consent under Neb. Rev. Stat. §71-6901 et seq.
- District Court denied petition; expedited appeal under §71-6902; review is de novo under §71-6904.
- Petitioner placed with Nebraska DHHS after parental rights were terminated; foster care under state supervision.
- District Court found petitioner not sufficiently mature or well informed to decide on abortion.
- Petitioner argued Department regulation and statutory framework permit ward to obtain consent without parents; majority held otherwise.
- Proceeding affirms district court; issues limited to three statutory grounds and jurisdictional constraints under §71-6903 and §71-6904.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waiver of parental consent—abuse/neglect evidence | Anonymous 5 contends abuse/neglect by a parent/guardian justifies waiver. | State argues abuse/neglect by current guardians not established; parental rights terminated. | Not met; abuse/neglect must be by parent/guardian in place at petition time. |
| Sufficiency of maturity and information | Petitioner claims she is mature and well informed. | Court may rely on trial judge’s observations; record shows lack of maturity. | Petitioner failed to prove maturity and informed judgment by clear and convincing evidence. |
| guardianship and consent authority | Foster parents should be considered guardians for consent. | DHHS is the ward’s legal guardian; foster parents are not guardians. | Foster parents are not guardians; DHHS remains guardian; consent cannot be obtained from foster parents. |
| Jurisdiction to entertain judicial bypass | Electing not to obtain consent was unmet because consent unavailable. | Election to bypass required; impossible here since no guardian can consent. | District court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to hear bypass petition. |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Petition of Anonymous 3, 279 Neb. 912, 782 N.W.2d 591 (2010) (de novo review of mature/well-informed standard in abortion-by-judicial-bypass)
- In re Petition of Anonymous 1, 251 Neb. 424, 558 N.W.2d 784 (1997) (maturity/judgment considerations in abortion-by-judicial-bypass)
- In re Petition of Anonymous 2, 253 Neb. 485, 570 N.W.2d 836 (1997) (abuse/neglect considerations for abortion bypass)
- Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 99 S. Ct. 3035, 61 L. Ed. 2d 797 (1979) (constitutional basis for parental consent/notification)
- Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Assn., 267 Neb. 849, 678 N.W.2d 726 (2004) (illustrative rule on pleading and procedure)
- Nebraska Republican Party v. Gale, 283 Neb. 596, 812 N.W.2d 273 (2012) (agency regulations have force of statutory law when properly adopted)
- In re Interest of Trey H., 281 Neb. 760, 798 N.W.2d 607 (2011) (state interests in protecting a minor ward; procedural context)
