History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692
850 N.W.2d 699
Minn.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Brost is an attorney admitted in 1987 who was indefinitely suspended in 2009 for notarization fraud and related misconduct; the OLPR petitioned for disciplinary action based on theft by swindle and identity theft involving about $43,000 and on non-cooperation with the investigation.
  • Brost allegedly stole $43,000 from client A.F. by cashing annuity payments and pretending to be A.F. to surrender an annuity.
  • Brost pleaded guilty in July 2013 to theft by swindle and to identity theft; she was convicted of these felonies.
  • Brost failed to respond to the disciplinary petition or to multiple OLPR requests for information, leading the court to deem the allegations admitted.
  • The Director seeks disbarment, arguing that the misconduct (theft, identity theft) and noncooperation constitute serious professional misconduct under Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4 and RLPR Rule 25.
  • The court weighed the nature of the misconduct, cumulative weight, harm to the public and profession, and aggravating factors, and concluded disbarment is warranted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether disbarment is appropriate for the misconduct Director: misappropriation and identity theft with noncooperation merits disbarment Brost: not addressed (nonresponse) Disbarment warranted
Whether noncooperation alone supports severe discipline Director: noncooperation increases severity Brost: (no response) Yes, noncooperation increases severity
Whether cumulative weight and aggravating factors justify disbarment Director: multiple acts over time; selfish motive; prior discipline Brost: (no response) Disbarment supported by cumulative weight and aggravating factors

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Rebeau, 787 N.W.2d 168 (Minn. 2010) (disbarment appropriate for serious misconduct; aggravating/mitigating factors considered)
  • In re Fru, 829 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 2013) (discipline framework and factors guiding punishment)
  • In re Jones, 834 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 2013) (presumptive discipline for misappropriation; mitigating factors considered)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 23, 2014
Citation: 850 N.W.2d 699
Docket Number: A13-2307
Court Abbreviation: Minn.