in Re: Patrick J. Curry and PJC Equipment Leasing, LLC
407 S.W.3d 376
Tex. App.2013Background
- Relators Patrick J. Curry and PJC Equipment Leasing owned an IAI Westwind II and employed MKW Aviation for management, maintenance, storage, and flight/log coordination, with MKW in possession.
- Relators sued in Sept. 2012 for declaratory judgment on amounts owed; in Nov. 2012 the trial court issued a writ of sequestration requiring MKW to relinquish the aircraft, records, and logs.
- In Jan. 2013 MKW filed a FAA lien for $35,890.31 for storage, maintenance, and fuel; later that month MKW answered and counterclaimed for breach, sworn account, and theft of services.
- MKW sought turnover relief under Texas Property Code § 70.302; the trial court granted turnover on May 24, 2013.
- Relators petitioned for mandamus contending the court abused its discretion by signing the turnover order; the court denied relief and lifted the stay as to the aircraft.
- Statutory framework: Section 70.301 creates an automatic lien for storage, fuel, repairs, or maintenance; Section 70.302 describes retention/retake procedures; Section 9.609 governs repossession, with a reference in § 70.302(b).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether §70.302(b) allows non-secured lienholders to retake an aircraft | Curry argues only a secured party may retake. | MKW argues §70.302(b) permits their retaking as lienholder. | Yes; §70.302(b) permits non-secured lienholders to retake. |
| Whether the turnover order constitutes an abuse of discretion | Curry contends the order was an abuse of discretion. | MKW contends the order was proper under the statute. | No abuse; turnover order upheld. |
Key Cases Cited
- Leland v. Brandal, 257 S.W.3d 204 (Tex. 2008) (statutory construction; give effect to all provisions)
- First Nat’l Bank in Dallas v. Whirlpool Corp., 517 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1974) (self-executing mechanic’s lien; protection of labor and materialmen)
- City of Dallas v. Abbott, 304 S.W.3d 380 (Tex. 2010) (statutory interpretation; avoid superfluous language)
