History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Paternity of DL
938 N.E.2d 1221
Ind. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • D.L. was born to C.L. and Mother in 1993; paternity established in 1996 with C.L. ordered to pay support for two children.
  • Genetic testing in 2009 showed C.L. was not D.L.'s biological father; K.G. was identified as the biological father for D.L.
  • DNA results were entered as evidence in 2009 and K.G. paternity was established; custody and support orders were modified.
  • C.L. was found to owe arrearages for D.L. prior to the 2009 paternity change, and sought relief from arrearage.
  • Trial court initially declined relief from arrearage; in 2010 the court denied re-evaluation of arrearage relating to D.L.
  • Court held that paternity vacated due to mistake of fact terminates child support obligations and arrearage for the affected child staff; remanded for arrearage calculation related to D.L.'s brother.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Disestablishment of paternity and relief from arrearage C.L. seeks relief under mistake/fraud grounds. State argues no relief beyond existing orders. Relief from arrearage granted; paternity effectively vacated.
Applicability of Indiana Code 31-14-11-23 to the facts Section applies when paternity vacated for fraud/mistake. Statutory relief may be limited by prior rules. Statute applicable; arrearage terminated.
Whether Murphy governs retroactive modification of support Murphy supports reimbursement of past payments through termination. Murphy differs; not controlling in this context. Murphy distinguished; not controlling; relief based on 31-14-11-23.
Whether the case requires remand for arrearage calculation Arrearage tied to D.L.; seek appropriate calculation. Remand needed to separate arrearage for D.L.'s brother. Remanded to calculate D.L.-specific arrearage and plan.

Key Cases Cited

  • Murphy v. Murphy, 608 N.E.2d 1000 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993) (retroactive modification of support not allowed; future modifications only)
  • Fairrow v. Fairrow, 559 N.E.2d 597 (Ind. 1990) (genetic testing outside ordinary care; non-paternity relief context)
  • In re Paternity of M.M.B., 877 N.E.2d 1239 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (relief from paternity vacatur and related support issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Paternity of DL
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 21, 2010
Citation: 938 N.E.2d 1221
Docket Number: 88A01-1002-JP-224
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
    In Re Paternity of DL, 938 N.E.2d 1221