History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Nomination Petition of Beyer
115 A.3d 835
| Pa. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Beyer listed occupation as “lawyer” on nomination petitions while not licensed to practice law.
  • He graduated law school in May 2013 and had not taken or passed any state's bar exam.
  • Commonwealth Court found the occupation defect was not material or misleading enough to preclude amendment.
  • PA Election Code sections 976–977 govern whether defects are amendable and whether petitions must be set aside.
  • The Court ultimately held the defect was material, knowing, and not amendable, requiring striking Beyer’s petitions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Beyer’s occupation designation was a material defect set to mislead Beyer allegedly intended to mislead electors by calling himself a lawyer Beyer did not intend to deceive; occupation included law students Yes; defect material and intended to mislead
Whether the defect was amenable to amendment under the Election Code Amendment should have been allowed under §977 Defect was material to electors and not amenable to amendment No; not amendable; petitions must be set aside
Whether the evidence supports a finding of wrongful intent Commonwealth Court erred in crediting lack of intent Record shows knowledge petition could mislead electors No; record supports intent to mislead; scienter established
Whether the Court erred by striking the petition rather than remanding for amendment Striking was too harsh; amendment could fix defects Election integrity requires striking to prevent voter deception Yes; striking was appropriate to protect electorate

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Nomination Petition of McIntyre, 778 A.2d 746 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001) (wrongful intent precludes amendment)
  • In re Nomination Petition of Gales, 618 Pa. 93 (Pa. 2012) (nomination petition defects presumed valid; burden on challenger)
  • In Farnese, 17 A.3d 375 (Pa. 2011) (liberal construction of Election Code but safeguards against fraud)
  • In re Nomination Petition of Delle Donne, 779 A.2d 1 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001) (material defects may be amended or set aside depending on intent)
  • Driscoll, 577 Pa. 501 (Pa. 2004) (Election Code interpreted to protect voters; amendments allowed for material defects)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Nomination Petition of Beyer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 5, 2014
Citation: 115 A.3d 835
Court Abbreviation: Pa.