History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Neals
459 B.R. 612
Bankr. D.S.C.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed a joint Chapter 13 petition on Oct. 4, 2010.
  • ASC asserted a secured claim on the residence at 114 Mulberry Hill, Sum merville, SC for $178,000 with scheduled value of $175,000.
  • Debtors amended Schedule D and Plan; Plan provided direct payments to ASC and cure via the trustee.
  • May 12, 2011, Plan confirmed.
  • ASC amended its relief-from-stay motion (July 13, 2011) alleging default on post-petition payments and no equity; claimed total debt $205,757.78 and FMV $175,000; Debtors objected on standing, adequacy of protection, and necessity for reorganization; ASC presented original Note and Mortgage and related indorsements at hearing; Debtors questioned ownership of Note and signatures.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ASC is a party in interest with standing to seek relief Neals Neals Yes; ASC is a party in interest and real party in interest.
Whether ASC possesses the right to enforce the Note ASC has the right to enforce via possession and endorsements Debtors questioned ownership of Note ASC has the right to enforce as a nonholder in possession with rights of a holder.
Whether there is cause to lift the stay under § 362(d)(1) Debtors defaulted on post-petition payments; lack of adequate protection Debtors lack of payments due to confusion; equity cushion Cause exists; stay lifted under § 362(d)(1).
Whether relief is also warranted under § 362(d)(2) Property has no equity and is not necessary for reorganization Not necessary to address if § 362(d)(1) supports relief Court did not reach § 362(d)(2) since § 362(d)(1) relief granted.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Woodberry, 383 B.R. 373 (Bankr.D.S.C.2008) (servicer standing to seek relief from stay; real party in interest)
  • In re Nichols, 440 F.3d 850 (6th Cir.2006) (post-petition default requires substantial or excusable factors for relief)
  • In re James River Assocs., 148 B.R. 790 (E.D.Va.1992) (equity cushion and ongoing default support relief from stay)
  • Va. Elec. & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 485 F.2d 78 (4th Cir.1973) (real party in interest definition for enforcement rights)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Neals
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Date Published: Oct 6, 2011
Citation: 459 B.R. 612
Docket Number: 19-01133
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. D.S.C.