In re Mi.S.
65 N.E.3d 922
| Ill. App. Ct. | 2016Background
- Father (Bahaa S.) was charged with murdering the children’s mother on December 19, 2012; three youngest children (Mi.S., P.S., Ma.S.) were placed in DCFS custody.
- Four‑year‑old Mi.S. was at home during the incident, had blood spatter on him, and gave a recorded victim‑sensitive interview describing his father hitting his mother with a long object; photos and a metal bar were introduced.
- Father gave a statement to police admitting he struck the mother with a curling bar during an altercation; mother’s death certificate listed blunt head trauma.
- Juvenile court previously adjudicated the children dependent and found the father dispositionally unable to care for them due to incarceration and reports of domestic violence.
- The State petitioned to terminate parental rights under Adoption Act §1D(b) and §1D(e) (extreme or repeated cruelty); at trial the court found clear and convincing evidence only as to §1D(e).
- After a best‑interest hearing, the trial court terminated the father’s parental rights; the appellate court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Father) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether “extreme or repeated cruelty” under 750 ILCS 50/1D(e) includes non‑physical (emotional/mental) cruelty | Statute encompasses extreme emotional cruelty; father’s killing of the mother subjected the children to extreme emotional cruelty | “Cruelty” requires physical harm to the child; father did not physically harm the children | The phrase includes extreme emotional or mental cruelty; the father’s act (uxoricide) satisfied §1D(e) |
Key Cases Cited
- People v. Donoho, 204 Ill. 2d 159 (2003) (plain‑meaning statutory interpretation rules)
- In re A.G., 325 Ill. App. 3d 429 (2001) (consider legislative purpose and related statutes in construction)
- In re B.R., 282 Ill. App. 3d 665 (1996) (extreme cruelty applied to severe physical abuse)
- In re D.L.W., 226 Ill. App. 3d 805 (1992) (repeated physical abuse supports unfitness)
- In re E.P., 167 Ill. App. 3d 534 (1988) (sexual abuse as extreme cruelty)
- In re Wheeler, 86 Ill. App. 3d 564 (1980) (repeated physical abuse grounds for unfitness)
- In re Dixon, 81 Ill. App. 3d 493 (1980) (physical abuse sufficient for termination)
- In re Hollis, 135 Ill. App. 3d 585 (1985) (clear‑and‑convincing standard for parental unfitness)
- In re B.W., 309 Ill. App. 3d 493 (1999) (Adoption Act construed liberally with Juvenile Court Act; child’s best interests paramount)
