History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re McQuaid
492 B.R. 514
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Trustee Grochocinski objects to the Debtors’ exemption in the Alice M. Wood Special Needs Trust funded by a disability settlement.
  • Trust funds originated from Ms. Wood’s settlement with a disability insurer in 2009; Debtors created the Trust in 2012, two months before petition.
  • Ms. Wood is the Trust beneficiary; Mr. McQuaid is the Trustee.
  • Debtors claim exemption under Illinois 735 ILCS 5/12-1001(g)(3) for the right to receive a disability benefit.
  • Trustee argues the statute protects the right to receive, not the benefit or funds traceable to it, and the timing/funding undermines exemption.
  • Petition filed as joint Chapter 7 on August 29, 2012; Court has jurisdiction as a core proceeding.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does § 12-1001(g)(3) exempt the Debtors’ right to receive disability benefits, not the funds in the Trust? Grochocinski: exemption is for the right to receive benefits. Wood/McQuaid: funds in the Trust qualify as the benefit’s proceeds. Exemption denied; cannot exempt funds under § 12-1001(g)(3).
Are funds traceable to disability benefits already received exempt under § 12-1001(g)(3)? Grochocinski relies on the plain language focusing on the right to receive, not traceability. Wood/McQuaid contend traceable funds should qualify. Not exempt; statute protects only the right to receive, not traceable funds.
Does the 'traceable to' framework of § 12-1001(h) affect the outcome for § 12-1001(g)(3)? Grochocinski notes h) language shows a different treatment for traceable funds. Wood/McQuaid argue similar treatment should apply. § 12-1001(g)(3) lacks 'traceable to' language; separate treatment confirms non-exemption here.
Does the Trust’s formation timing and discretionary distributions affect exemption under the Illinois statute? Grochocinski contends the Trust structure should not override the statute. Wood/McQuaid assert the Trust arrangement aligns with exempt purposes. Trust funds do not fall within § 12-1001(g)(3) due to timing and discretionary scope.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Pope-Clifton, 355 Ill.App.3d 478 (2005) (emphasizes focus on the right to receive disability benefits, not the funds)
  • Fayette County Hosp. v. Reavis, 169 Ill.App.3d 246 (1988) (funds traceable to Social Security benefits are not exempt when only the right to receive is protected)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re McQuaid
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Date Published: May 16, 2013
Citation: 492 B.R. 514
Docket Number: No. 12 B 34265
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. N.D. Ill.