midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
566 B.R. 286
D.R.I.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • State Superior Court imposed Rule 11 sanction against debtor Keven McKenna in March 2015; monetary sanction balance was $17,267.06 as of November 9, 2016.
  • State Court set an installment payment schedule and threatened incarceration for nonpayment; McKenna missed the second installment due March 1, 2017.
  • McKenna filed a Chapter 13 petition on March 1, 2017 and proposed to pay the sanction through his plan.
  • Creditor Ronald Blanchard filed an emergency motion arguing the Rule 11 sanction enforcement is exempt from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4).
  • Bankruptcy Court held the dispute focused on enforcement/collection of an already-imposed monetary judgment, not the initial imposition of Rule 11 sanctions.
  • Court denied Blanchard’s Stay Exemption Motion, holding enforcement/collection of money judgments is stayed under § 362(a).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does § 362(b)(4) exempt enforcement/collection of a state-court Rule 11 monetary sanction from the automatic stay? Blanchard: § 362(b)(4) allows governmental or court actions to continue to enforce police/regulatory powers, so Rule 11 sanction enforcement is exempt. McKenna: § 362(b)(4) does not cover enforcement/collection of money judgments; the automatic stay prevents collection. Denied — enforcement/collection of an already-imposed monetary sanction is subject to the automatic stay under § 362(a); § 362(b)(4) does not exempt money-judgment collections.

Key Cases Cited

  • Alpern v. Lieb, 11 F.3d 689 (7th Cir. 1993) (distinguishes proceedings to impose Rule 11 sanctions from enforcement of resulting money judgments)
  • Maritan v. Todd, 203 B.R. 740 (N.D. Okla. 1996) (enforcement of a money judgment by a governmental unit is subject to § 362(a))
  • In re McMullen, 386 F.3d 320 (1st Cir. 2004) (describing the automatic stay’s purpose to protect estate and orderly distribution)
  • In re First Alliance Mortgage Co., 263 B.R. 99 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 2001) (§ 362(b)(4) may permit actions to fix non-monetary relief but collection/enforcement of restitution is stayed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re McKenna
Court Name: District Court, D. Rhode Island
Date Published: Apr 14, 2017
Citations: 566 B.R. 286; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1134; BK No: 17-10314
Docket Number: BK No: 17-10314
Court Abbreviation: D.R.I.
Log In