History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re M.R.
2011 Ohio 3733
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • In re M.R., Jr., Greene County, Ohio Court of Appeals; termination of parental rights and grant of permanent custody to GCCSB; decision August 6, 2010; Father appeals filed September 3, 2010.
  • M.R. (born March 8, 2001) is child of Father and Mother; J.R. born to Mother with her boyfriend N.H.; GCCSB became involved due to J.R.’s methadone addiction findings and parental incarceration.
  • GCCSB obtained ex parte emergency custody October 8, 2007; shelter care hearing October 9, 2007; adjudication of dependency/neglect December 18, 2007; temporary custody to GCCSB thereafter.
  • M.R. placed with paternal aunt/uncle in May 2008, briefly, then returned to GCCSB custody October 8, 2008 and placed in a foster home where he has resided since.
  • Father released from prison November 2007, lived with grandmother W.B.; both parents largely failed to comply with the case plan from December 2007 through October 2008; Father later incarcerated again January 2010.
  • GCCSB moved for permanent custody March 5, 2010; Mother’s June 25, 2010 drug screen was positive; hearing held August 3, 2010; permanent custody granted August 6, 2010; Father represented by counsel but not present due to incarceration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether denial of transportation to the hearing violated due process Father argues due process violation from being denied transport to the hearing. GCCSB argues court properly exercised discretion with represented parent, full record, and alternative means to present position. No abuse of discretion; denial affirmed.
Whether permanent custody to GCCSB was in M.R.’s best interests Father contends not in best interests; child wished to live with Father after release; relatives proposed as placement. GCCSB argues statutory criteria met; no suitable relatives; child in stable foster care; GAL recommended permanent custody. Court properly found in best interests to grant permanent custody to GCCSB.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re R.D., 2009-Ohio-1287 (Ohio) (incarcerated parent may be accommodated by counsel and record without transport)
  • The Matter of Joseph P., 2003-Ohio-2217 (Ohio) (court discretion on transportation of incarcerated parent)
  • Vanderlaan v. Pollex, 96 Ohio App.3d 235 (1994) (abuse of discretion standard for juvenile court decisions)
  • Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (U.S. 1976) (due process balancing factors for procedural safeguards)
  • In re C. W., 2004-Ohio-6411 (Ohio) (best interests and statutory framework for permanent custody)
  • In re D.J., 2006-Ohio-6304 (Ohio) (limits on extensions of temporary custody)
  • In re Joseph P., 2003-Ohio-2217 (Ohio) (deposition as alternative to presence at hearing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re M.R.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 29, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 3733
Docket Number: 2010 CA 64
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.