History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
1:11-md-02262
S.D.N.Y.
Nov 18, 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Exchange-Based Plaintiffs seek reconsideration and leave to amend in three actions in MDL 2262 and 11 Civ. 2613 (S.D.N.Y.).
  • LIBOR III rejected trader-based claims outside 2005–2007 time frame and rejected the merits of new allegations.
  • Plaintiffs sought to add post-2007 trader-based claims; court considered letters and briefing from Aug.–Sept. 2014.
  • Plaintiffs also sought to amend to add Lloyds and Rabobank as defendants with trader-based manipulation theories.
  • Court reiterates inquiry-notice framework under the Commodities Exchange Act and prior LIBOR decisions; motions denied on merits and as untimely.
  • Order issued November 7, 2014, denying all three amendments and related reconsideration requests.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Reconsideration of LIBOR III on inquiry notice timing Plaintiffs contend LIBOR III misapplied inquiry notice to post-2007 claims. Court previously held notice began 2008; changes not warranted. Denied; reconsideration not warranted; on-notice timing remains.
Leave to amend to add Lloyds trader-based claims Lloyds 2008–2009 dates and DOJ/CF TC materials support amendment. Time-barred 2008 date; no evidence of artificial submission in 2009; amendment futile. Denied; claims time-barred or inadequately supported.
Leave to amend to add Rabobank agreement with Lloyds Proposed Yen LIBOR settlements show possible USD LIBOR manipulation. Settlement evidence speculative; lacks direct link to Rabobank-US LIBOR manipulation. Denied; amendment speculative and insufficiently supported.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Fosamax Prods. Liab. Litig., 815 F. Supp. 2d 649 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (reconsideration and notice issues discussed in complex MDL)
  • Koch v. Christie’s Int’l PLC, 699 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2012) (inquiry notice and duty to inquire under securities/commodities fraud)
  • In re LIBOR-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig., 935 F. Supp. 2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (LIBOR I: inquiry notice framework and limitations analysis)
  • In re LIBOR-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig., 962 F. Supp. 2d 606 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (LIBOR II: pleading standards for trader-based manipulation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Nov 18, 2014
Docket Number: 1:11-md-02262
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.