midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
537 B.R. 856
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed Chapter 13 on Oct. 12, 2014; no plan was ever confirmed and the Trustee moved to dismiss for nonpayment; the case was dismissed on June 3, 2015.
  • At dismissal the Chapter 13 Trustee held $3,606.84 in post-petition plan payments, including $147.92 earmarked as adequate protection payments for secured creditor Santander.
  • Trustee filed a motion asking how to distribute the funds; debtors' counsel Brett Billec filed for payment of post-petition attorney fees ($1,200) from those funds and attached a fee application.
  • Trustee took no position but suggested Harris v. Viegelahn might control; counsel argued Harris (conversion context) is inapplicable and that §1326(a)(2) governs dismissal distributions.
  • The court held a hearing, permitted briefing, and concluded counsel was entitled to an administrative expense of $1,000 under §503(b)(2); the Trustee must pay that amount first and then return remaining funds to the Debtors under §§1326(a)(2) and 349(b)(3).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does Harris v. Viegelahn control distribution of trustee-held post‑petition wages when a Chapter 13 case is dismissed? Harris is inapplicable because it addresses conversion, not dismissal. Trustee suggested Harris rationale might apply to dismissal. Court: Harris does not apply; it is grounded on §348 (conversion), not dismissal.
Which statute governs disposition of plan payments on dismissal: §349(b)(3) general revesting or §1326(a)(2) specific distribution rule? §1326(a)(2) dictates trustee must return payments after paying allowed administrative expenses. Trustee initially suggested Harris; otherwise no firm alternative statutory priority offered. Court: §1326(a)(2)’s specific directives control; funds are first used to pay allowed §503(b) expenses, then returned to debtor per §§1326(a)(2) and 349(b)(3).
Are debtor’s counsel’s post‑petition fees payable from trustee-held funds as an administrative expense under §503(b)(2)/§330? Counsel sought $1,200 for post‑petition services, arguing they benefitted and were necessary. Trustee took no position on amount. Court: Allowed $1,000 as a §503(b)(2) administrative expense under §330 standards; ordered payment prior to returning remaining funds.
Are accrued adequate protection payments owed to Santander payable from the trustee’s funds on dismissal? (Implicit) Santander’s accrued payments are for its benefit and could be paid. Trustee held such funds but did not press a statutory exception. Court: $147.92 held as adequate protection is not a §503(b) administrative expense nor a payment "not previously paid and not yet due and owing" under §1326(a)(3); return to Debtors with the other funds.

Key Cases Cited

  • Harris v. Viegelahn, 135 S. Ct. 1829 (U.S. 2015) (post‑petition wages held by Chapter 13 trustee upon conversion to Chapter 7 are returned to debtor under §348(f), not distributed to creditors)
  • Mass. v. Pappalardo (In re Steenstra), 307 B.R. 732 (1st Cir. BAP 2004) (§1326(a)(2) requires trustee to return post‑petition funds on dismissal after payment of allowed administrative expenses)
  • In re Inyamah, 378 B.R. 183 (S.D. Ohio 2007) (concluded §1326(a)(2) governs distribution on dismissal)
  • In re Doherty, 229 B.R. 461 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1999) (discussing trustee’s duty to complete administration and pay allowed §503(b) expenses before returning funds on dismissal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Kirk
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Aug 27, 2015
Citations: 537 B.R. 856; 74 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 405; 2015 WL 5097741; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 2907; CASE NUMBER 14-42186
Docket Number: CASE NUMBER 14-42186
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Log In
    In re Kirk, 537 B.R. 856