History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Joseph M. Gately
CC-16-1086-TaFMc
| 9th Cir. BAP | Nov 15, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Joseph M. Gately (debtor) and Joni Gately were divorced; family court issued a Ruling addressing spousal support and awarded Joni attorney’s fees of $3,500 to be paid directly to her counsel, Brian Moore.
  • Debtor did not pay; sheriff levied $3,777.90 from debtor’s wages; debtor filed Chapter 13 and claimed a wildcard exemption on the levied funds.
  • Debtor moved under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1) to avoid the judicial lien securing the fee award; Joni opposed, arguing the fee award was a domestic support obligation under § 523(a)(5) and thus not avoidable.
  • Bankruptcy court found the attorney’s fee award was in the nature of spousal support (domestic support obligation) and denied the motion to avoid lien; debtor appealed.
  • The BAP reviewed de novo whether the lien was avoidable and for clear error the factual determination whether the debt was a domestic support obligation, and affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of the avoidance motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the judicial lien securing the attorney’s fee award is avoidable under § 522(f)(1) Gately: the fee award is an equalization/payment separate from spousal support and thus avoidable (or dischargeable under § 523(a)(15)) Joni: fee award is in the nature of spousal support (domestic support obligation) under § 523(a)(5), so the judicial lien is excluded from avoidance under § 522(f)(1)(A) Court held the fee award was a domestic support obligation; lien not avoidable under § 522(f)(1)

Key Cases Cited

  • McCoy v. Kuiken (In re Kuiken), 484 B.R. 766 (9th Cir. BAP) (standard of review for lien avoidance under § 522(f)(1))
  • Culver, LLC v. Chiu (In re Chiu), 304 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2002) (elements for avoiding a judicial lien under § 522(f)(1))
  • Beaupied v. Chang (In re Chang), 163 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. 1998) (factors for characterizing obligations as domestic support)
  • Gionis v. Wayne (In re Gionis), 92 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 1996) (attorney’s fees in dissolution may be non-dischargeable as support)
  • TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc., 653 F.3d 820 (9th Cir. 2011) (clear error standard explained)
  • Rivera v. Orange Cty. Prob. Dep’t, 832 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2016) (discussion of § 101(14A) definition of domestic support obligation)
  • Bendetti v. Gunness (In re Gunness), 505 B.R. 1 (9th Cir. BAP) (standing and analysis for fee awards as support)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Joseph M. Gately
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 15, 2016
Docket Number: CC-16-1086-TaFMc
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir. BAP