In Re Jordan, 364 S.W.3d 425

Relator Misty Jordan sues former employer Gajekse, Inc. for sexually hostile work environment and firing.
Relator claims she saw sexually graphic content on company computers and alleges she created memoranda about it on her work computer.
Relator asserts she never viewed pornography before employment at Gajekse.
Gajekse requests production of relator's home computer and hard drive; trial court orders production for forensic examination.
Order allows examination of internet history, emails, and memoranda; Weekley procedure not followed; court abuses discretion and mandamus relief is appropriate.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Did the trial court abuse its discretion ordering a forensic search?	Weekley requires specific requests, clear production form, and safeguards.	Need for targeted verification of alleged misconduct justifies intrusion.	Yes; court abused discretion due to noncompliance with Weekley procedures.
Is mandamus proper to remedy the intrusive discovery order?	There is no adequate remedy at law and error cannot be cured on appeal.	Remedy at law may exist after fuller proceedings, not mandamus.	Yes; relator entitled to mandamus relief if trial court does not vacate the order.

In re Weekley Homes, L.P., 295 S.W.3d 309 (Tex. 2009) (sets procedures for computer hard-drive production and cautions on intrusion)
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding; abuse of discretion standard)
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124 (Tex. 2004) (protective- order considerations and adequate remedy at law)