In Re Je
309 Ga. App. 51
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- J.E. is a child who was deprived at birth due to the mother's cocaine use during pregnancy and positive birth tests; the Department filed a deprivation petition and awarded custody to the Department.
- Over years, the mother failed to obtain stable employment or housing, repeatedly entered and left drug treatment, and had multiple positive drug screens.
- The juvenile court adopted a case plan requiring sobriety, housing, employment, parenting classes, drug screening, and regular visits, but the mother failed to meet key goals and paid no child support.
- From 2008 to 2009 the mother faced employment instability, homelessness, relapse into cocaine use, and a relapse in April 2009 with cocaine detected in drug tests.
- Despite some periods of sobriety and ongoing visitation with J.E., the court repeatedly found that progress toward reunification was insufficient to warrant return of custody to the mother.
- In June 2009 the Department petitioned for termination of parental rights; a psychologist, guardian ad litem, and addiction counselor all supported termination based on risk of relapse, failure to provide for the child, and need for permanence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether deprivation likely to continue is proven | Mother's ongoing drug use and failure to meet case-plan goals show continued deprivation. | Mother argues present improvements and bond with child negate likelihood of continued deprivation. | Yes; deprivation likely to continue. |
| Whether continued deprivation will cause serious harm | Past relapse, lack of housing and support, and risk of relapse would cause serious harm if maintained. | Positive present bond and foster stability mitigate risk of serious harm from continued deprivation. | Yes; continued deprivation likely to cause serious harm. |
| Best interests of the child | Child needs permanence and a secure home, which termination would provide via adoption by foster parent. | Preserving the parent-child bond and continued visitation favors reunification over termination. | Termination in child's best interests. |
Key Cases Cited
- In the Interest of R.N., 224 Ga.App. 202 (1997) (deferral to trial court findings; standard for reviewing termination evidence)
- In the Interest of A.G., 287 Ga.App. 732 (2007) (clear and convincing evidence; harm standard in deprivation context)
- In the Interest of K.A.S., 279 Ga.App. 643 (2006) (deprivation and likelihood of continued harm; housing and income as factors)
- In the Interest of J.K., 278 Ga.App. 564 (2006) (present relationship and future harm inquiry; disapproved in part by later decision)
- Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) (due process and heightened burden; fundamental right to familial relations)
