In re: James Donzil Roberts, Sr. and Deena Waldman Roberts
CC-17-1010-STaL
| 9th Cir. BAP | Nov 13, 2017Background
- Debtor James D. Roberts solicited investment for a joint venture (California Organics LLC) by representing it was a going farming concern that would sell self-grown organic produce to retailers. Those representations were false.
- Investor Michael Barnes lent Organics $822,000 (about $825,000 in findings) secured by substantial farm equipment owned by Manjar/ Martinez. Barnes was also named a “class B manager” in the operating agreement.
- Organics in fact bought produce from third-party suppliers, incurred large unpaid PACA (Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act) debts, and concealed those facts from Barnes.
- PACA suppliers sued; to avoid PACA exposure Barnes assigned his security interest in the farm-equipment collateral to PACA creditors as part of a settlement, and PACA creditors foreclosed on that collateral.
- Bankruptcy court held Roberts’ misrepresentations caused Barnes’ $825,000 loss and entered a nondischargeability judgment under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). Roberts appealed only arguing the court should have credited the equipment’s value against Barnes’ damages.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Barnes) | Defendant's Argument (Roberts) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the bankruptcy court erred by failing to credit collateral value against Barnes’ fraud damages | The argument was forfeited because Roberts never raised disposition/value of collateral at trial; bankruptcy court found Barnes had to assign collateral to PACA creditors and thus lost it | Collateral was worth millions and should offset Barnes’ $825,000 loss; invoke Cal. Com. Code commercial-reasonableness/deficiency rules | Affirmed. Roberts forfeited the issue by not raising it below; bankruptcy court found collateral was assigned to PACA creditors and Barnes lost it; Commercial Code defenses not properly invoked and are factbound so not considered on appeal |
Key Cases Cited
- Sunkist Growers v. Fisher, 104 F.3d 280 (9th Cir.) (PACA-trust principles and control-person liability)
- Nickey Gregory Co. v. AgriCap, LLC, 597 F.3d 591 (4th Cir.) (general trust principles govern PACA trusts)
- Weis-Buy Services, Inc. v. Paglia, 411 F.3d 415 (3d Cir.) (individual liability under PACA arises from common law breach of trust)
- Turtle Rock Meadows Homeowners Ass'n v. Slyman (In re Slyman), 234 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.) (elements for § 523(a)(2)(A) fraud/nondischargeability)
- Scovis v. Henrichsen (In re Scovis), 249 F.3d 975 (9th Cir.) (issues not raised below are ordinarily forfeited on appeal)
- Mano–Y & M, Ltd. v. Field (In re Mortgage Store, Inc.), 773 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.) (circumstances when appellate courts may consider new issues on appeal)
