History
  • No items yet
midpage
69 A.3d 406
Me.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • J.R. Jr. born April 4, 2011; DHHS took custody after a preliminary protective order; siblings in DHHS custody since 2010; parents have a chaotic, abusive relationship with substance issues; jeopardy orders issued for both parents after hearings; termination petition filed April 10, 2012 seeking to end parental rights due to risk and failure to reunify.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court erred in finding the father unfit Father argues lack of fit due to conduct not addressed by rehab Court should consider progress and placement issues There was ample evidence supporting unfitness bases
Whether the best interests finding was legally and factually supported Best interests favored keeping J.R. Jr. with foster/adoptive placement Record shows permanency with kin or foster care is best Best interests supported by clear and convincing evidence; no abuse of discretion
Whether the trial judge properly denied the motion to recuse Judge biased due to prior involvement with father Judge able to be impartial; recusal not warranted No abuse of discretion; judge adequately determined impartiality and denied recusal
Whether the motion to withdraw counsel was properly denied Attorney withdrew due to bar complaint; withdrawal needed Court conducted thorough inquiry; withdrawal denied as delay tactic No abuse of discretion; court properly denied withdrawal after inquiry

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Marcus S., 2007 ME 24 (Me. 2007) (sufficiency of evidence to support termination findings)
  • In re Higera N., 2010 ME 77 (Me. 2010) (rehabilitation unmet does not preclude unfitness findings)
  • In re Doris G., 2006 ME 142 (Me. 2006) (department's failure to fully reunify does not bar termination)
  • In re Jacob B., 2008 ME 168 (Me. 2008) (best interest factors can combine to support termination)
  • In re Michael M., 2000 ME 204 (Me. 2000) (recusal discretion; avoid delay without basis)
  • State v. Murphy, 2010 ME 140 (Me. 2010) (recusal considerations in contentious proceedings)
  • State v. Dunbar, 2008 ME 182 (Me. 2008) (abuse of discretion standard for withdrawal of counsel)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re J.R. Jr.
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jun 18, 2013
Citations: 69 A.3d 406; 2013 Me. LEXIS 58; 2013 WL 3007296; 2013 ME 58; Docket Aro-12-411
Docket Number: Docket Aro-12-411
Court Abbreviation: Me.
Log In
    In re J.R. Jr., 69 A.3d 406