midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
342 P.3d 35
Mont.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • L.M.F. (born 2008) and J.A.B. (born 2012) are children of Mother; Father is J.A.B.’s father and C.F. is L.M.F.’s birth father who is incarcerated and relinquished his rights.
  • Department repeatedly found methamphetamine use and unsafe home environments in the family since L.M.F.’s removal in 2009, including drug activity in the home and supervising adults with felony records.
  • L.M.F. was placed with her paternal grandparents for most of the past five years; Mountain Home program participation occurred; L.M.F. later transitioned back to Mother and Father who were pursuing treatment.
  • J.A.B. was born during the proceedings and initially remained with Mother under supervision; later both children were in foster care after drug-use concerns resurfaced.
  • In 2013–2014, the District Court terminated parental rights for L.M.F. due to Mother’s failure to fully comply with the treatment plan and unlikely improvement; and terminated both parents’ rights for J.A.B. due to aggravated circumstances or lack of reunification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the court abuse its discretion in terminating Mother’s rights to L.M.F. for not fully complying with her treatment plan? Mother Mother’s noncompliance supports termination No abuse; termination affirmed
Did the court abuse its discretion by terminating Mother and Father’s rights to J.A.B. without reunification services due to aggravated circumstances? Mother and Father Aggravated circumstances warranted no reunification No abuse; termination affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • In re E.Z.C., 370 Mont. 116 (2013 MT) (termination standard; clear error review)
  • In re A.D.B., 370 Mont. 422 (2013 MT) (compliance with treatment plan required; partial compliance insufficient)
  • In re D.F., 337 Mont. 461 (2007 MT) (full compliance required; ultimate outcome depends on substantial evidence)
  • In re J.C., 319 Mont. 112 (2003 MT) (analysis of treatment plan and compliance)
  • In re M.N., 362 Mont. 186 (2011 MT) (chronic and severe neglect; long-term pattern; permanency priority)
  • In re M.T., 310 Mont. 506 (2002 MT) (evaluation of likelihood of change based on past conduct)
  • In re L.N., 329 P.3d 598 (2014 MT) (aggravated circumstances; reunification not required)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re J.A.B.
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 27, 2015
Citations: 342 P.3d 35; 378 Mont. 119; 2015 Mont. LEXIS 21; 2015 MT 28; No. DA 14-0262
Docket Number: No. DA 14-0262
Court Abbreviation: Mont.
Log In