History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Interest of Hunter L. & Opie L.
A-17-652, A-17-653
Neb. Ct. App.
Jan 9, 2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Mother Amber L. has twin boys born Aug. 2015; DHHS opened a voluntary case in Sept. 2015 for unsanitary home conditions; case closed Jan. 2016 after 30 days of cleanliness.
  • April 1, 2016: police find the home cluttered, unsanitary, with moldy food, animal feces, and medications; children removed and Amber later convicted of child neglect.
  • Children returned ~Sept. 2016; Oct. 13, 2016: Opie became strangled in a cord but was not seriously injured; officer noted clutter hindered timely response.
  • Nov. 19, 2016: officers again find unsanitary, cluttered conditions (old milk bottle, mashed food, limited safe sleeping/playing space); children removed again.
  • Psychological evaluation diagnosed Amber with hoarding disorder and borderline personality disorder; prognosis guarded/poor due to lack of insight and limited motivation; long-term treatment required.
  • DHHS caseworkers and therapists reported chronic failure to maintain a clean, sanitary home despite frequent visits and assistance; juvenile court terminated Amber’s parental rights under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-292 and found termination in the children’s best interests.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether statutory grounds under § 43-292 exist to terminate parental rights State: Amber’s mental illness (hoarding + personality disorder) prevents discharge of parental duties and will persist for a prolonged indeterminate period Amber: Evidence insufficient to prove statutory bases for termination Court: Clear and convincing evidence supports termination under § 43-292(5) (unable to discharge parental responsibilities due to mental illness)
Whether termination is in children’s best interests State: Chronic unsanitary/cluttered home stemming from Amber’s disorders endangers children’s development and safety; reunification unlikely in reasonable time Amber: Termination not shown to be in children’s best interests (argues for reunification) Court: Termination is in the children’s best interests given ongoing risk, lack of consistent improvement, and long-term prognosis

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Interest of Nicole M., 287 Neb. 685 (discussing de novo review in juvenile cases)
  • In re Interest of Giavonna G., 23 Neb. App. 853 (holding one statutory ground is sufficient for termination)
  • In re Interest of Kendra M., 283 Neb. 1014 (best-interests requirement for termination)
  • In re Interest of Ty M. & Devon M., 265 Neb. 150 (unsanitary home as symptom of deeper parental inability; cannot be remedied simply by cleaning)
  • In re Interest of Shane L. et al., 21 Neb. App. 591 (children should not await uncertain parental rehabilitation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Interest of Hunter L. & Opie L.
Court Name: Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 9, 2018
Docket Number: A-17-652, A-17-653
Court Abbreviation: Neb. Ct. App.