History
  • No items yet
midpage
842 N.W.2d 191
Neb. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Mariella B. and Brianna B. were removed from May Lynn L.'s custody in Feb. 2008 and placed in DHHS care; guardianship as a permanency goal emerged by 2009 with DHHS recommending guardianship over reunification.
  • DHHS pursued guardianship with multiple potential guardians over years due to disruptions and May Lynn's objections, while attempting reunification initially.
  • May Lynn repeatedly opposed guardianship, sought increased visitation, and requested physical custody as DHHS identified a guardian.
  • In Dec. 2012, the juvenile court approved guardianship and, after hearings, issued letters of guardianship in Jan. 2013; May Lynn appealed.
  • The court found letters issued properly but determined it had no authority to order visitation, reversing in part and remanding for a visitation determination.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether guardianship letters were properly issued May Lynn asserts improper issuance and lack of procedural due process DHHS/State contends juvenile court had authority under the juvenile code to establish guardianship without probate procedures Letters issued properly; guardianship valid
Whether the juvenile court had authority to order visitation May Lynn argues no statutory basis for visitation in guardianship Court lacks explicit power to award visitation in guardianship Court has authority to order visitation; remanded for visitation determination

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Guardianship of Rebecca B. et al., 260 Neb. 922, 621 N.W.2d 289 (2000) (juvenile court may establish guardianships without probate code procedures when juveniles are DHHS wards)
  • In re Interest of Stacey D. & Shannon D., 12 Neb. App. 707, 684 N.W.2d 594 (2004) (continuing jurisdiction and ability to order supervised visitation in guardianship context)
  • In re Interest of Amber G. et al., 250 Neb. 973, 554 N.W.2d 142 (1996) (guardianship not equivalent to permanent parenthood; permanency implications)
  • In re Interest of Veronica H., 272 Neb. 370, 721 N.W.2d 651 (2006) (jurisdictional and liberal construction principles guiding juvenile code to protect juveniles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Interest of Brianna B.
Court Name: Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 14, 2014
Citations: 842 N.W.2d 191; 21 Neb. App. 657; A-13-054, A-13-055
Docket Number: A-13-054, A-13-055
Court Abbreviation: Neb. Ct. App.
Log In