History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Interest of Antonio J.
295 Neb. 112
| Neb. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • The State filed an amended juvenile petition alleging five children were at risk due to parents’ fault or habits; Count I contained allegations against the mother and Count II against the father.
  • At the start of the adjudication hearing (six months after filing), the State moved to dismiss two factual allegations without prejudice: that the father subjected a juvenile to inappropriate sexual contact and that the mother knew or should have known of it.
  • The juvenile court refused the State’s request to dismiss those allegations without prejudice and instead ordered them dismissed with prejudice.
  • The parties entered a plea agreement: parents admitted to certain allegations of failing to provide proper care and supervision; the court accepted admissions and adjudicated the children.
  • The State appealed the court’s dismissal-with-prejudice ruling, arguing it had the right to dismiss the allegations prior to trial without leave of court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the State may voluntarily dismiss a count/allegation in juvenile court prior to trial as a matter of right State: county attorney may dismiss counts before trial without court permission Parents/Court: court may condition dismissal or convert to dismissal with prejudice Court: State may dismiss counts prior to trial as a matter of right; dismissal ordered without prejudice, not with prejudice
Whether dismissal with prejudice was proper where no evidence had been presented State: dismissal with prejudice wrongly adjudicates merits without trial Court: (implied) believed dismissal with prejudice appropriate in context Court: dismissing with prejudice was error because merits were not adjudicated

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Interest of Moore, 186 Neb. 67, 180 N.W.2d 917 (1970) (county attorney may dismiss juvenile action/count prior to trial without leave of court)
  • Simpson v. City of North Platte, 215 Neb. 351, 338 N.W.2d 450 (1983) (dismissal with prejudice is an adjudication on the merits)
  • In re Interest of Enyce J. & Eternity M., 291 Neb. 965, 870 N.W.2d 413 (2015) (standard of review for questions of law)
  • Knapp v. Village of Beaver City, 273 Neb. 156, 728 N.W.2d 96 (2007) (discussing voluntary dismissal as generally a right)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Interest of Antonio J.
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 28, 2016
Citation: 295 Neb. 112
Docket Number: S-16-276
Court Abbreviation: Neb.