History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re I.B.L.
2014 Ohio 4666
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Child I.B.L. was removed June 2012 after WCCS found hazardous home conditions and concerns of adult drug use; placed in temporary custody.
  • Mother A.L. admitted dependency (Aug. 2012); child remained in WCCS custody.
  • WCCS moved for permanent custody (Feb. 2014), alleging the child had been in agency custody more than 12 of the past 22 months.
  • Mother, incarcerated at Ohio Reformatory for Women, requested transport to the permanent custody hearing; the trial court denied transport but allowed deposition or notarized affidavit.
  • Mother submitted an affidavit; guardian ad litem and foster family supported permanent custody.
  • Trial court granted WCCS permanent custody (May 2014). Mother appealed, arguing denial of transport violated due process.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether denying an incarcerated parent transport to a permanent custody hearing violates due process A.L.: due process requires her presence at hearing; denial prevented her meaningful participation WCCS: state interest in avoiding expense/risks of transport, counsel and affidavit/deposition protect rights Court: No due process violation — Mathews balancing favors allowing alternative testimony (affidavit/deposition) and counsel representation

Key Cases Cited

  • Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (establishes three‑part due process balancing test)
  • Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) (parental custody is a fundamental liberty interest)
  • In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155 (1990) (recognizes parental fundamental right to raise child in Ohio)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re I.B.L.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 4666
Docket Number: 14CA19
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.