History
  • No items yet
midpage
745 S.E.2d 532
W. Va.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Sybil J. is guardian of eight-year-old Haylea G. under a 2008 guardianship; Amber B. and Justin G. are Haylea’s parents.
  • In 2012 the Fayette County circuit court terminated Sybil J.’s guardianship and ordered repayment of SSA benefits paid to Haylea through Sybil J.
  • SSA benefits totaling about $9,000 were paid to Sybil J. as payee; she used funds to repay a loan and placed remaining funds in her own account.
  • Guardian ad litem and others recommended continuing the guardianship; the circuit court believed Amber B. had reformed and should regain custody with structured visitation.
  • The circuit court terminated the guardianship but ordered the return of SSA funds to the guardian ad litem; it also imposed a daily monetary sanction if funds were not returned.
  • The appeal challenges (a) termination of guardianship, and (b) the order directing return of SSA funds and sanctions; the court affirms in part and reverses in part.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was termination of guardianship an abuse of discretion? Sybil J. contends bond with Haylea urged continuation; guardian ad litem favored continued guardianship. Amber B. as natural parent is paramount; court could modify guardianship given improvements in Amber B.'s situation. Guardianship termination affirmed; Amber B.'s parental rights deemed paramount.
Did circuit court have jurisdiction to order return of SSA funds? Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over federal SSA funds; funds should be handled administratively. Circuit court could address funds as part of guardianship proceedings and enforcement of payee duties. Circuit court’s order to transfer funds reversed; court lacks jurisdiction to order return of SSA funds.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Willis, 157 W.Va. 225 (1973) (parental right to custody is paramount)
  • Whiteman v. Robinson, 145 W.Va. 685 (1960) (natural right to custody recognized and enforced)
  • Hammock v. Wise, 158 W.Va. 343 (1975) (best interests not to deny custody to a parent merely because another could provide a better home)
  • In re Beth Ann B., 204 W.Va. 424 (1998) (two-prong standard of review for child custody findings; abuse of discretion)
  • In re Clifford K., 217 W.Va. 625 (2005) (definition of psychological parent and impact on custody)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re HAYLEA G.
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 18, 2013
Citations: 745 S.E.2d 532; 2013 WL 3156005; 231 W. Va. 494; 2013 W. Va. LEXIS 723; 12-1242
Docket Number: 12-1242
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.
Log In
    In Re HAYLEA G., 745 S.E.2d 532