History
  • No items yet
midpage
493 B.R. 31
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Issue: disposition of undistributed funds held by Chapter 13 trustee at dismissal after confirmation.
  • Section 349(b)(3) governs dismissal: absent cause order, undistributed funds vest in debtor.
  • Postpetition earnings are property of the Chapter 13 estate under 1306 and vest at dismissal.
  • Trustee held funds due to unresolved claims objections, preventing distribution under the confirmed plan.
  • Courts generally hold funds vest in the debtor; dismissal reverts estates to pre-petition rights; Congress expectations favor quick relief and no diversion to creditors absent cause.
  • Policy rationale favors returning undistributed funds to the debtor to preserve status quo ante and encourage Chapter 13 participation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Disposition of undistributed funds at dismissal SOUTHEAST or trustee: funds to creditors per plan Court should follow plan distributions, with objections resolved Undistributed funds must be returned to debtors (subject to for-cause order)
Effect of §349(b)(3) on vesting of postpetition earnings Debtor should retain funds post-dismissal Funds revest in debtor only if §349(b)(3) permits Postpetition earnings vest in debtor at dismissal unless court orders otherwise
Role of §1326 post-confirmation funds Funds held at dismissal should be distributed under plan §1326 not applicable to post-confirmation funds at dismissal §1326(a)(2) applies to pre-confirmation funds; not controlling for post-confirmation dismissal
Court’s discretion under §349(b)(3) Courts should allow distribution to creditors Discretion should be exercised with notice to all interested parties Discretion exists; requires notice and opportunity to seek different outcome
Notice and process for 'for cause' orders Anyone may request 'for cause' disposition Need orderly process Notice to all interested parties required before ordering otherwise

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Nash, 765 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1985) (distributions and vesting under §1326(a)(2) timed with confirmation)
  • In re Slaughter, 141 B.R. 663-64 (Bankr.N.D. Ill. 1992) (§349(b)(3) vesting and undoing bankruptcy broadly discussed)
  • In re Williams, 488 B.R. 380 (Bankr.N.D. Ill. 2013) (post-confirmation dismissal and vesting; policy considerations)
  • In re Michael, 699 F.3d 305 (3d Cir. 2012) (post-confirmation funds held by trustee must be returned absent bad faith)
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Oparaji (In re Oparaji), 698 F.3d 231 (5th Cir. 2012) (dismissal effects and revesting of estate in pre-petition entity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Hamilton
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
Date Published: May 16, 2013
Citations: 493 B.R. 31; 2013 WL 2151457; Nos. 3:12-BK-04600, 3:11-BK-10429, 3:12-BK-03021
Docket Number: Nos. 3:12-BK-04600, 3:11-BK-10429, 3:12-BK-03021
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
Log In