midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
573 B.R. 197
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • GDP and GDH filed two related Chapter 11 cases in Charlotte, North Carolina, challenging venue as improper under 28 U.S.C. § 1408 or, alternatively, seeking transfer under § 1412.
  • Fact record shows GDP and GDH’s primary assets and operations are located in Dickinson, North Dakota.
  • Cibix Management, Merlin Holdings, and Stephen Barker control the Debtors and have substantial North Carolina ties but day-to-day hotel operations are managed on-site in North Dakota by Kinseth Hospitality.
  • Most creditors and contract counterparties are located in North Dakota, with the hotel revenue and assets concentrated there.
  • Debtors’ principal places of business are in North Carolina, but the majority of assets, creditors, witnesses, and operations are in North Dakota.
  • The bankruptcy court granted transfer of venue to North Dakota under § 1412, but denied dismissal under § 1408 for improper venue.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether venue is proper in the Western District of North Carolina under § 1408. GDP/GDH contend NC is proper because principal place of business is in Charlotte. Bankruptcy Administrator argues venue should be transferred for convenience/justice under § 1412. No; venue proper in NC under § 1408.
Whether the cases should be transferred to North Dakota under § 1412. Transfer unnecessary as venue is proper in NC and management ties to NC persist. Transfer to North Dakota serves convenience of parties and justice given assets, witnesses, and creditors in ND. Granted; transfer to North Dakota affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010) (defines principal place of business for § 1408 analysis)
  • Old Delmar Corp., 45 B.R. 883 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) (location of income-producing asset supports transfer to venue near asset)
  • Pavilion Place Assocs., 88 B.R. 32 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988) (real estate asset locality favors venue near asset)
  • Pinehaven Assoc., 132 B.R. 982 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1991) (proximity of day-to-day operations favors transfer)
  • Rehoboth Hospitality, LP, 2011 WL 5024267 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011) (asset location and witnesses support transfer (official reporter not available))
  • Commonwealth Oil Ref. Co., 596 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1979) (six-factor test for convenience of parties analysis)
  • Patriot Coal Corp., 482 B.R. 718 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012) (disjunctive § 1412 standard: convenience or interest of justice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Grand Dakota Partners, LLC
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina
Date Published: Aug 28, 2017
Citations: 573 B.R. 197; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 2442; Case No. 17-31184
Docket Number: Case No. 17-31184
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D.N.C.
Log In