midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
459 B.R. 861
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor filed Chapter 7 petition March 1, 2011, and disclosed schedules and statement of financial affairs on March 16, 2011.
  • On Schedule C, the Debtor did not claim the residence as exempt initially; he indicated an intention to surrender the Property to the mortgagee in the Statement of Intention.
  • The Trustee filed a Report and Notice of Intention to Sell the Property; Debtor objected and amended Schedule C to claim Florida homestead exemption and amended Statement of Intention to indicate intent to retain the Property.
  • The Trustee objected to the amended exemption claiming lack of intent to reside permanently due to the stated surrender intent; Debtor testified to permanent residence despite foreclosure risk.
  • The court ultimately ruled that the Statement of Intention cannot defeat the homestead exemption and that the Debtor’s intent to reside indefinitely supports exemption; the Property cannot be sold.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does a debtor's stated intention to surrender defeat homestead exemption? Gentry argues surrender does not preclude permanent residence and exemption relates back. Trustee contends surrender showed lack of permanent intent, defeating exemption. No; exemption stands; surrender intent alone does not defeat homestead.
Does amendment to Schedule C relate back to the petition date for exemption? Amendment to claim exemption retroactively valid. Trustee may challenge timing based on lack of intent. Amendment relates back to petition date; exemption valid.
Is the Florida homestead exemption liberally construed in bankruptcy? Florida liberal interpretation favors exemptions. Trustee argues strict application due to surrender indication. Exemption liberally construed in debtor’s favor.
Has the debtor abandoned the homestead to nullify exemption? Debtor has not abandoned; no intent to return removed. Surrendering with intent to foreclose implies abandonment. No abandonment; surrender alone does not equal abandonment here.

Key Cases Cited

  • Butterworth v. Caggiano, 605 So.2d 56 (Fla.1992) (homestead exemption liberally construed)
  • Engel v. Engel, 97 So.2d 140 (Fla.1957) (permanency notion for homestead is indefinite period, not forever)
  • Barlow v. Barlow, 23 So.2d 723 (Fla.1945) (abandonment of homestead occurs when owner leaves, does not intend to return)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Gentry
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Nov 15, 2011
Citations: 459 B.R. 861; 66 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 995; 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4283; 2011 WL 5574918; 8:11-bk-03796-CED
Docket Number: 8:11-bk-03796-CED
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Log In
    In Re Gentry, 459 B.R. 861