midpage
2013 Ohio 5310
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • G. McC. (born 10/16/2012) is child of K. McC. and D.J. McC.; JFS filed a complaint December 20, 2012 alleging neglect/dependency.
  • Shelter-care hearing December 21, 2012 placed child in temporary custody of maternal aunt, then briefly to Stark County Sheriff due to location issues.
  • Columbiana County case indicated mother had prior involvement; mother failed to complete case-plan requirements there.
  • Witnesses testified to concerns about mother's housing instability, incomplete services, and inconsistent visitation with the child.
  • Browns (maternal half-sister and husband) gained custody of the mother's older child in Columbiana County; child in this case was not the subject there.
  • Magistrate found G. McC. dependent; trial court remanded for findings; judgment entry April 26, 2013 affirmed prior finding of dependency.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the child was properly found dependent under R.C. 2151.04(C). McC. claims lack of clear and convincing evidence. McC. contends evidence does not meet standard. Yes; sufficient, credible evidence supported dependency.
Whether the trial court erred in applying the clear-and-convincing standard for dependency. SCDJFS argues standard was met. Parents contend standard was not met. The standard was properly applied and met.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Pierce, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2008–0019, 2008-Ohio-6716 (Ohio 2008) (deprivation adjudication requires clear and convincing evidence)
  • In re Christian, 4th Dist. Athens No. 04CA10, 2004-Ohio-3146 (Ohio 2004) (focus on child’s condition, not parental faults)
  • In re Bishop, 36 Ohio App.3d 123, 521 N.E.2d 838 (1987) (dependency determination guided by child’s environment)
  • In re Bibb, 70 Ohio App.2d 117, 435 N.E.2d 96 (1980) (prior cases inform standard for dependency adjudication)
  • In re Riddle, 79 Ohio St.3d 259, 680 N.E.2d 1227 (1997) (establishes standard for dependency determinations)
  • Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, 120 N.E.2d 118 (1954) (defines 'clear and convincing' standard body of proof)
  • Holcomb v. Adoption, 18 Ohio St.3d 361, 481 N.E.2d 613 (1985) (clarifies burden of proof in abuse/neglect proceedings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re G. McC.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 2, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 5310; 2013CA00103, 2013CA00106
Docket Number: 2013CA00103, 2013CA00106
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In