History
  • No items yet
midpage
105 A.3d 1057
N.H.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Decedent Muriel R. Mills owned Manchester property subject to a 2006 home equity conversion mortgage with a statutory power of sale; mortgage barred personal liability and limited enforcement to sale of the property.
  • Petitioner Walter Hebert was appointed executor on March 5, 2012 and notified the mortgagee (Financial Freedom) of the death, requesting payoff and assignment info.
  • Financial Freedom did not file a probate claim under RSA chapter 556; later informed the estate it intended to foreclose under the mortgage power of sale and accelerated the note.
  • On November 27, 2012 the mortgage was assigned to respondent Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and recorded.
  • Petitioner sued in May 2013 to quiet title, arguing the mortgagee abandoned its interest by failing to present a claim under RSA chapter 556; respondent moved to dismiss and the trial court granted dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Hebert) Defendant's Argument (Fannie Mae) Held
Whether probate filing deadlines in RSA chapter 556 bar foreclosure by power of sale Mortgages are not exempt from RSA 556; failure to present a claim or sue within statutory deadlines abandoned the mortgage interest RSA 556 deadlines govern actions/suits against an administrator, not nonjudicial foreclosure under a mortgagee's statutory power of sale Court held RSA 556 does not bar a mortgagee from enforcing a power of sale; nonjudicial foreclosure is not an "action" under RSA chapter 556
Whether a decree pro confesso / default should be entered against Financial Freedom because it did not appear Financial Freedom failed to appear/answer in the quiet title action, so a default and pro confesso should be entered Financial Freedom was not a party at filing because it had assigned the mortgage; respondent (assignee) appeared and asserted its recorded interest Court rejected default argument; assignee was proper party and appearance/motion to dismiss were appropriate

Key Cases Cited

  • Plaisted v. LaBrie, 165 A.3d 194 (N.H. 2013) (dismissal standard: pleadings must be reasonably susceptible to a construction permitting recovery)
  • Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 A.3d 608 (N.H. 2013) (statutory interpretation reviewed de novo; examine plain meaning)
  • Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSB, 994 F. Supp. 82 (D.N.H. 1998) (power of sale mortgages permit foreclosure without court proceedings)
  • Porter v. Coco, 154 A.3d 353 (N.H. 2006) (necessary parties are those with an interest in the subject matter)
  • Skrizowski v. Chandler, 133 A.3d 502 (N.H. 1990) (deadline for creditors to present claims to an estate; potential time-bar of claims)
  • Stewart v. Farrel, 131 A.3d 458 (N.H. 1989) (RSA chapter 556 sets filing deadlines for claims against estates)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Estate of Muriel R. Mills
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Nov 13, 2014
Citations: 105 A.3d 1057; 167 N.H. 125; 2013-0649
Docket Number: 2013-0649
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
Log In