63 A.3d 867
R.I.2013Background
- Guardianship and estate litigation over Glenn Griggs spanning 2000–2010, with appellants seeking to challenge a contempt-sanctions order.
- Probate Court awarded temporary co-guardianship to Heal and Dan Griggs; appellants refused to disclose Griggs’s location.
- In 2010 the Probate Court imposed about $447,000 in contempt sanctions against appellants.
- Appellants filed claims and reasons of appeal in Superior Court in Jan 2011 but provided only the decision and reasons, not the record.
- Superior Court granted sanctions execution and dismissed the appeals for failure to timely provide the probate record; appellants appealed to Rhode Island Supreme Court.
- Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court’s judgments citing insufficient record to perfect the appeal and limits on extending record deadlines.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the appeals were properly dismissed for failure to provide a proper record. | Griggs objected to record insufficiency and sought extension. | Record was incomplete; §33-23-1 requires substantial record to perfect appeal. | Yes; appeals affirmed despite missing transcript/record. |
| Whether §33-23-1(c) allows extending time for the entire record, not just transcripts. | Extension should cover entire probate record. | Extension applies only to transcripts, not to the entire file. | §33-23-1(c) applies to transcripts; did not permit extending the record deadline. |
| Whether the trial justice erred in dismissing the appeals without a complete record. | Record could be supplemented later with necessary documents. | Record was insufficient to perfect appeal; dismissal appropriate under Griggs I. | No error; dismissal affirmed due to lack of substantial record. |
| Whether the Probate Court had inherent authority to sanction and whether death of ward affected jurisdiction. | Sanctions and jurisdiction remain challengeable despite ward’s death. | Probate Court possessed authority; death did not negate sanctions. | Not reviewable on this record; affirmed due to lack of adequate record. |
Key Cases Cited
- Griggs v. Estate of Griggs, 845 A.2d 1006 (R.I. 2004) (record perfection limits; substantial record required to perfect appeal)
- Adams v. Christie’s, Inc., 880 A.2d 774 (R.I. 2005) (transcript necessity; risky to appeal without transcript)
- Sentas v. Sentas, 911 A.2d 266 (R.I. 2006) (requirement to inform court of transcript status; duty to complete record)
- Procopio v. PRM Concrete Corp., 711 A.2d 650 (R.I. 1998) (clerk transmits record when complete; limitations on extensions)
- N & M Properties, LLC v. Town of West Warwick, 964 A.2d 1141 (R.I. 2009) (de novo review standard for questions of law (background))
