History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re ESTATE OF EMMETT TAYLOR BOYD
340 Ga. App. 744
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Emmett and Betty Boyd married in 1987; after a separation and reconciliation they executed a post-nuptial agreement in 2002 negotiated with independent counsel and with schedules of assets attached.
  • Paragraph 3 of the Agreement provided that, if Emmett died while married, Betty would receive Emmett’s one-half interest in the marital residence and its furnishings.
  • Paragraph 7 provided that if either spouse moved out or filed a divorce action, each would receive one-half of items on Exhibit D as a full settlement of claims for alimony, support, or property division, and each would release further claims against the other.
  • In April–May 2015 Emmett signed and had a verified divorce complaint filed with the Camden County Superior Court; he died a few hours after the clerk stamped the filing.
  • Betty filed for a year’s support from Emmett’s estate; Charlie (Emmett’s son) filed a caveat asserting the Agreement barred Betty’s Petition. The superior court granted summary judgment to Charlie, holding Paragraph 7 applied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Betty) Defendant's Argument (Charlie) Held
Does Paragraph 7’s reference to a spouse who “files a divorce action” apply when the complaint was delivered to the court clerk before the filer’s death? Betty argued the post-nuptial should not trigger Paragraph 7 to bar her claims because the divorce was not resolved and she invoked Paragraph 3 on death. Charlie argued Emmett’s verified complaint was filed before death, triggering Paragraph 7 and its release of claims. Court: The word “file” is unambiguous; delivery to the clerk constituted filing, so Paragraph 7 was triggered.
If Paragraph 7 was triggered, does clause 1 (settlement of alimony/support/property claims in divorce) bar Betty’s year’s support claim? Betty contended she is entitled to year’s support on death (OCGA §53‑3‑1) and Paragraph 1 addresses only divorce claims. Charlie argued the Agreement’s settlement terms replace other post‑death claims. Court: Clause 1 concerns divorce claims and does not bar the year’s support claim because the divorce action abated on death.
Did clause 2 (general release of "any further claims") in Paragraph 7 release Betty’s right to a year’s support? Betty argued any release of year’s support must be a knowing waiver with awareness of rights and estate condition; there was insufficient evidence she knowingly waived that right. Charlie argued the general release encompassed all further claims, including year’s support. Court: Whether Betty knowingly waived her year’s support is a factual question; summary judgment was improper and the judgment was vacated and remanded for that inquiry.
Was Emmett competent and was the divorce filing valid such that Paragraph 7 could be triggered? Betty suggested Emmett may have lacked competency to hire counsel or sign verification. Charlie relied on attorney affidavit and the verified complaint to show competence and valid filing. Court: Evidence did not support a competency finding for summary judgment purposes; competency challenge was insufficiently supported to defeat enforcement at summary judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Eversbusch v. Eversbusch, 293 Ga. 60 (2013) (courts enforce agreements as written when interpreting post‑nuptial contracts)
  • Global Ship Systems, LLC v. Continental Cas. Co., 292 Ga. App. 214 (2008) (three‑step contract construction process: plain meaning, rules of construction, then factual inquiry)
  • Freund v. Warren, 320 Ga. App. 765 (2013) (unambiguous contracts are enforced according to plain terms)
  • Guthrie v. Guthrie, 277 Ga. 700 (2004) (an unresolved divorce claim abates on the filer’s death)
  • Hubbard v. Hubbard, 218 Ga. 617 (1963) (waiver of a widow’s right to year’s support must be made with knowledge of her rights and estate condition)
  • Adams v. Adams, 249 Ga. 477 (1980s) (whether a waiver of year’s support was knowing and supported by consideration is a question of fact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re ESTATE OF EMMETT TAYLOR BOYD
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 15, 2017
Citation: 340 Ga. App. 744
Docket Number: A16A1632
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.