History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Estate of Elkins
32 A.3d 768
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • George W. Elkins created two perpetual charitable trusts for Abington Memorial Hospital and Hahnemann Hospital under his 1919 will; income was to be distributed to the hospitals, not for a building fund.
  • PNC Bank, as trustee, filed accounts and sought a cy pres determination after Hahnemann Hospital’s charitable purpose was deemed to have failed following ownership changes.
  • Allegheny University Hospitals was acquired by Tenet (for-profit); PHRC dissolved and assets transferred to PHEC, which operated hospitals and medical schools as nonprofit entities.
  • PHRC dissolution and asset transfers left the Hahnemann trust endowments to be distributed by cy pres to a hospital-like entity serving the Hahnemann area, rather than to the original hospitals.
  • An initial 2004 orphans’ court adjudication found the Hahnemann trust’s purposes failed and Abington was an improper cy pres beneficiary; on remand, evidence showed PHEC’s extensive hospital-like activities in the area.
  • This appeal consolidates seven hospitals’ challenges to the orphans’ court’s remand determination that PHEC is the proper cy pres beneficiary and the court’s accompanying orders.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is PHEC the proper cy pres beneficiary for Elkins’s Hahnemann Trust? PHEC is not a hospital and does not closely resemble the original purpose. PHEC provides hospital-like services and serves the community area previously served by Hahnemann. Yes; PHEC is proper cy pres beneficiary.
Did the court violate law-of-the-case by revisiting its earlier ruling on cy pres eligibility? Law-of-the-case governs remand/coordinate decisions; PHEC was not decided previously. Law-of-the-case does not bar reexamination of cy pres eligibility on remand. No; court properly revisited and affirmed the cy pres award to PHEC.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Women's Homeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia, 393 Pa. 313 (Pa. 1958) (cy pres standard for charitable trusts; broad discretion of the orphans' court)
  • Commonwealth v. Starr, 541 Pa. 564 (1995) (law-of-the-case limitations on subsequent appellate review)
  • In re Estate of Miller, 18 A.3d 1163 (Pa.Super.2011) (en banc; standard of review for orphans’ court findings and cy pres)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Estate of Elkins
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 1, 2011
Citation: 32 A.3d 768
Docket Number: 2147 EDA 2009, 2598 EDA 2009, 2618 EDA 2009, 2763 EDA 2009, 2775 EDA 2009, 2780 EDA 2009, 2786 EDA 2009
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.