History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Estate of Alberts
293 Neb. 1
| Neb. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Emil Alberts died in June 2013, survived by his spouse Lois and two nephews, Mark and Mike Alberts (co-personal representatives and trust beneficiaries).
  • Lois directed an attorney to file a petition electing one-half of Emil’s augmented estate under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2313; the petition was signed and filed by her attorney.
  • Seventeen months before Emil’s death, Emil and Lois executed complementary estate documents and four deeds; two deeds conveyed the disputed real estate (valued at $2,529,460) to Emil as trustee of Emil’s revocable trust, and both Emil and Lois signed those deeds.
  • Appellants objected that (1) the petition was invalid because Lois did not personally sign/file it, and (2) the trust-transferred property should be included in the augmented estate (i.e., not excluded by § 30-2314(c)(2)) because Emil retained powers over the revocable trust.
  • The county court upheld the petition’s validity and included the property value in the augmented estate; the Supreme Court affirmed the petition’s validity but held the property was excluded from the augmented estate under § 30-2314(c)(2) because the transfer was to a "person" (the trust) and was joined in by the surviving spouse.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Validity of elective-share petition: may an attorney sign/file it on surviving spouse's behalf? Appellants: petition void because Lois did not personally sign/file; statute requires spouse to exercise during his/her lifetime. Lois: she authorized counsel to file; statute does not require personal signature or filing by spouse. Petition valid: attorney may file on spouse's instruction; power to act for client presumed valid absent proof to contrary.
Inclusion of property transferred to decedent's revocable trust in augmented estate Appellants: property should be included because Emil retained revocation and enjoyment powers; thus § 30-2314(c)(2) exclusion inapplicable. Lois: her signature on deeds was consent; § 30-2314(c)(2) excludes property transferred by decedent to a person when deed was joined in by surviving spouse. Property excluded: trust qualifies as a "person"; deeds were joined in by Lois, so § 30-2314(c)(2) excludes the property from the augmented estate.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Estate of Fries, 279 Neb. 887 (Neb. 2010) (distinguishes transfers signed by surviving spouse that are not the decedent’s transfer and discusses when written consent excludes property from augmented estate)
  • Robertson v. Jacobs Cattle Co., 285 Neb. 859 (Neb. 2013) (statutory-construction principles and appellate review of legal questions)
  • Koch v. Koch, 226 Neb. 305 (Neb. 1987) (attorney’s power to act for client presumed valid until disproved)
  • Black v. Brooks, 285 Neb. 440 (Neb. 2013) (appellate limitations on adding language to statutes)
  • In re Estate of Lamplaugh, 270 Neb. 941 (Neb. 2006) (standards for appellate review of probate judgments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Estate of Alberts
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 11, 2016
Citation: 293 Neb. 1
Docket Number: S-15-173
Court Abbreviation: Neb.