History
  • No items yet
midpage
491 B.R. 633
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • 21 West holds 50% of the Debtor and MM Sag Harbor holds the other 50%.
  • The Debtor filed Chapter 11; 21 West seeks dismissal alleging lack of authority and bad faith.
  • Operating Agreement grants broad management powers to the Managing Member, with specific consent requirements for certain actions.
  • The petition was filed October 12, 2012, with the Debtor proposing a plan and seeking DIP financing from Amalgamated Bank.
  • The Operating Agreement does not explicitly require 21 West’s consent for filing a bankruptcy petition.
  • The court must determine if the Managing Member had authority to file and whether bad faith warrants dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Authority to file petition 21 West argues consent required for bankruptcy filing. MM Sag Harbor contends broad authority permits filing absent consent. Managing Member had authority to file; consent not required by agreement.
Bad faith filing 21 West asserts the filing is in bad faith to benefit insiders. Debtor argues plan is legitimate and not indicative of bad faith. No bad faith; petition not dismissed or converted.

Key Cases Cited

  • Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1945) (corporate management authority to file bankruptcy)
  • In re American Globus Corp., 195 B.R. 263 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1996) (state law governs corporate filing authority)
  • In re Avalon Hotel Partners, LLC, 302 B.R. 377 (Bankr.D.Or.2003) ( Avalon: bankruptcy filing treated as major decision requiring consent)
  • In re Raljoed Realty Co., 277 F.Supp.225 (S.D.N.Y.1967) (state law governs LLC authority to file)
  • In re Coudert Bros., 487 B.R. 375 (S.D.N.Y.2013) (contract interpretation under NY law in context of authority)
  • Prescott, Ball & Turben v. LTV Corp., 531 F.Supp. 213 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (distinguishes liquidation vs. bankruptcy terms)
  • In re Copy Crofters Quickprint, Inc., 92 B.R. 973 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1988) (bad faith standard in Chapter 11 context)
  • In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc., 184 B.R. 648 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (liquidating plans permitted in Chapter 11)
  • In re Century/ML Cable Venture, 294 B.R. 9 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2003) (bad faith standard and feasibility considerations)
  • In re Syndicorn Corp., 268 B.R. 26 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2001) (delineates scope of bad faith dismissal cautions)
  • In re G.S. Distrib., Inc., 331 B.R. 552 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2005) (courts dismiss bad faith sparingly)
  • In re C-TC 9th Ave. P’ship, 113 F.3d 1304 (2d Cir.1997) (futility and bad faith standards in bad faith analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re East End Development, LLC
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Apr 30, 2013
Citations: 491 B.R. 633; 2013 WL 1820182; 57 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 250; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 1752; No. 812-76181-reg
Docket Number: No. 812-76181-reg
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Log In
    In re East End Development, LLC, 491 B.R. 633