midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
461 B.R. 593
9th Cir. BAP
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors filed chapter 13 while disputing who could enforce the note and deed of trust on their Mammoth Lakes residence.
  • Debtors conceded a secured debt existed but contested U.S. Bank's standing and the proper creditor to receive payments.
  • Debtors filed a second amended plan attempting to treat the secured claim as unsecured and withheld payments pending claim resolution.
  • Bankruptcy court denied confirmation of the second amended plan and later converted the case to chapter 7 for cause.
  • Court allowed consolidation of the claim objection and adversary proceeding but ultimately found lack of good faith and delay justifying conversion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the court abuse its discretion denying confirmation? Thoreau de la Salle claim plan premised on disputed claim; payments not feasible. U.S. Bank's secured claim not provided for; plan unconfirmable under §1322/§1325; bad faith delay. No abuse; plan failed to provide for secured claim and feasibility.
Did U.S. Bank have standing as a party in interest to seek dismissal or conversion? Bank lacked proper standing due to disputed claim and adversary issues. Bank remained a creditor and thus a party in interest under §1307(c) to seek conversion. Bank had standing as a creditor/party in interest to seek conversion.
Was the conversion to chapter 7 proper under §1307(c)? Conversion premature and prejudicial; unresolved claim dispute and ongoing adversary proceedings. Delay, failure to propose a plan, and lack of good faith warranted conversion for creditors' best interests. Yes; conversion was proper for cause and in creditors’ best interests.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Eisen, 14 F.3d 469 (9th Cir. 1994) (totality of circumstances for bad faith and dismissal decisions)
  • In re Ellsworth, 455 B.R. 904 (9th Cir. BAP 2011) (two-step §1307(c) abuse of discretion framework; good faith)
  • In re Johnston, 149 B.R. 158 (9th Cir. BAP 1992) (creditor as party in interest for conversion/dismissal)
  • In re Torres Martinez, 397 B.R. 158 (1st Cir. BAP 2008) (analogous consideration of standing in bankruptcy contexts)
  • USAA Fed. Sav. Bank. v. Thacker (In re Taylor), 599 F.3d 880 (9th Cir. 2010) (standing and procedural posture in bankruptcy appeals)
  • Brown v. Sobczak (In re Sobczak), 369 B.R. 512 (9th Cir. BAP 2007) (standing de novo review standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In Re De La Salle
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 12, 2011
Citations: 461 B.R. 593; 2011 WL 6942896; BAP No. EC-11-1258-JuKiD. Bankruptcy No. 10-29678
Docket Number: BAP No. EC-11-1258-JuKiD. Bankruptcy No. 10-29678
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir. BAP
Log In