History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re D.L.M.
2025 Ohio 988
Ohio Ct. App.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • D.L.M., a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent for obstructing official business in Montgomery County, Ohio.
  • As part of his sentence, D.L.M. was ordered to pay a mandatory $9.00 court cost under R.C. 2743.70 (Marsy’s Law), despite being found indigent and having all other costs and fines waived.
  • D.L.M. requested the court waive the $9.00 cost based on his indigency, arguing that R.C. 2151.54 allows waiver of even mandatory fines in such circumstances.
  • The trial court declined to waive the $9.00, finding the cost to be strictly mandatory under R.C. 2743.70 and R.C. 2151.54.
  • On appeal, D.L.M. argued the trial court misinterpreted the relevant statutes and failed to exercise its discretion in considering his indigency with respect to the mandatory cost.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Discretion to waive mandatory $9 cost R.C. 2151.54 allows waiver of all costs (including mandatory ones) if juvenile is indigent and all costs are otherwise waived The $9 Marsy’s Law cost is mandatory and cannot be waived for indigency Trial court had discretion to waive; failed to exercise it, so remanded
Court’s consideration of indigency Court should evaluate indigency separate from ability to pay attorney Appointment of counsel for indigency doesn’t mean cost must be waived Court must assess indigency for costs, not just appointment of counsel
Standard of appellate review Abuse of discretion applies as D.L.M. properly objected N/A Abuse of discretion standard applied
Application of related precedent Supplemental authority (Dees) supports waiver if indigency shown N/A Court distinguishes Dees but agrees waiver possible if warranted

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Swartz, 2020-Ohio-5037 (definition of indigency for counsel distinct from ability to pay costs)
  • State v. Felder, 2006-Ohio-2330 (finding of indigency for counsel does not automatically waive court costs)
  • State v. Thomas, 2021-Ohio-1746 (financial sanction determination separate from indigency status)
  • AAAA Ents., Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp., 50 Ohio St.3d 157 (abuse of discretion standard explained)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re D.L.M.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 21, 2025
Citation: 2025 Ohio 988
Docket Number: 30291
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.