History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re D.B.J.
286 P.3d 1201
Mont.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • C.R., guardian and step-grandfather, appeals termination of guardianship of D.B.J.; the district court affirmatively terminated guardianship under best interests standard.
  • D.B.J. was born April 25, 2003; guardians were appointed in 2004 (maternal grandmother D.R. and C.R.); parents were in prison for drug charges; no durational limits on guardianships.
  • April 2010: DPHHS removed D.B.J. from the guardians’ home after reports of fear of C.R.; petitions filed for Emergency Protective Services, YINC, and TLC.
  • May 18, 2010 show cause hearing restricted guardians from cross-examining or presenting witnesses; Mother stipulated to TLC and EPP, but hearing largely focused on fear and potential abuse by C.R.
  • July 6, 2010 hearing adjudicated D.B.J. YINC and TLC to DPHHS; October 2010-C.R. psychotic episode; psychologist Dr. Dey found C.R. a poor caregiver;
  • June 28, 2011 petition to terminate guardianship; Sept. 13, 2011 guardian terminated under best interests standard §72-5-234, MCA; appeal affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether C.R. received due process despite initial exclusion C.R. had essential guardianship rights and was improperly excluded Procedural protections were adequate; later hearings remedied any gap No due process violation; fair opportunity to be heard existed.
Whether the 20-day show cause timeline was satisfied Hearing within 20 days of petition filing not met Court conducted initial hearing within 19 days; statute allows further hearings later District Court complied with § 41-3-432(1)(l)(a).
Whether termination of guardianship used best interests standard properly § 72-5-234 requires guardian removal under best interests Best interests standard appropriate for guardians removal; statutory framework differs from parent termination Yes; guardian terminated under §72-5-234, MCA.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Guardianship of D.T.N., 275 Mont. 480 (Mont. 1996) (guardianship removal not substitute for termination; distinct proceedings)
  • In re Custody & Parental Rights of M.W., 305 Mont. 80 (Mont. 2001) (pre-termination permanency plan hearings have lesser process rights)
  • In re Guardianship of J.R.G., 218 Mont. 336 (Mont. 1985) (best interests/guardian removal standard distinct from parent termination)
  • In re Guardianship of D.T.N., 914 P.2d 579 (Mont. 1996) (guardianship removal procedures and standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re D.B.J.
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 9, 2012
Citation: 286 P.3d 1201
Docket Number: No. DA 12-0069
Court Abbreviation: Mont.