midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
523 B.R. 93
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors Robert J. Cummings and DCummings filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy on March 7, 2014 after garnishment actions by the Creditor.
  • State court divorce proceedings yielded a Judgment of Divorce with non-modifiable spousal support of $850/month until $12,600 paid, and a later binding mediation award increasing spousal support and awarding fees.
  • The Mediation Award found the Debtor liable for unreturned property and other misconduct, and modified spousal support to include an additional $652/month, plus $75,000 in attorney fees, paid until the award is satisfied.
  • The State Court entered a Uniform Spousal Support Order incorporating the Mediation Award findings and directing ongoing monthly support of $1,394.50, plus continued support until the mediation judgment is paid, including fees.
  • The Debtors’ Plan proposed to treat the Creditor’s claim as a general unsecured claim and to pay ongoing domestic support obligations directly; Creditor objected to confirmation and sought dismissal for good faith grounds.
  • A consolidated evidentiary hearing was held, with testimony detailing alleged misconduct, mortgage arrangements, vehicle purchases, and the Debtors’ financial situation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Mediation Award and Support Order are domestic support obligations Cummings contends the awards are property settlement. Creditor argues they are non-dischargeable domestic support obligations under Sorah factors. The court holds they are domestic support obligations.
Plan confirmation feasibility with respect to domestic support obligations Creditor asserts the plan fails to provide full payment of priority claims. Debtors contend feasible plan if obligations are dischargeable. Plan not confirmable; Creditor’s domestic support priority cannot be discharged.
Whether the case was filed in good faith and whether dismissal is appropriate Creditor argues lack of good faith given pre-bankruptcy conduct and assetspending. Debtors argue good faith and need for relief. Court dismisses the case for lack of good faith under 11 U.S.C. 1307(c).

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Sorah, 163 F.3d 397 (6th Cir. 1998) (Sorah factors determine if obligation is domestic support)
  • In re Rugiero, 502 F. App’x 436 (6th Cir. 2012) (attorney-fee awards can be treated as support)
  • In re Calhoun, 715 F.2d 1103 (6th Cir. 1983) (federal test for whether a debt is in the nature of support)
  • In re Alt, 305 F.3d 419 (6th Cir. 2002) (good faith factors forChapter 13 dismissal)
  • In re Barrett, 964 F.2d 588 (6th Cir. 1992) (totality of circumstances for good faith in plan)
  • In re Mickler, 324 B.R. 305 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2005) (state-court support awards and reasonableness in bankruptcy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: In re Cummings
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Date Published: Dec 12, 2014
Citations: 523 B.R. 93; 2014 WL 7202109; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 5097; No. GG 14-01476-jtg
Docket Number: No. GG 14-01476-jtg
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D. Mich.
Log In
    In re Cummings, 523 B.R. 93