In Re Christopher C.
134 Conn. App. 464
| Conn. App. Ct. | 2012Background
- The respondent father verbally and physically abused the child's mother; the parents separated in May 2009.
- The respondent is a registered sex offender and cannot have unsupervised contact with the child under his probation terms.
- The petitioner took custody of the child on August 22, 2009 after the child was treated for multiple facial injuries consistent with physical abuse.
- A neglect petition was filed on August 26, 2009; the court adjudicated the child neglected on May 7, 2010 and committed him to the petitioner's custody on October 6, 2010.
- The petitioner filed a petition to terminate the respondent's parental rights on November 19, 2010; trial occurred with Judge Foley; the court issued a memorandum of decision on June 9, 2011 and entered judgment terminating parental rights.
- The court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that the department made reasonable efforts to reunify and that the respondent failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasonable reunification efforts | Department made reasonable reunification efforts. | Respondent challenges the sufficiency of reunification efforts. | moot; independent finding that respondent cannot benefit from reunification suffices |
| Personal rehabilitation | Respondent failed to achieve sufficient rehabilitation within a reasonable time. | Respondent argues rehabilitation was possible with continued efforts. | not clearly erroneous; substantial evidence of substance abuse, mental health issues, and criminal history |
| Judicial disqualification | No disqualification due to lack of demonstrated bias; prior sentencing does not show impartiality issues. | Judge Foley was biased due to prior sentencing, warranting recusal. | no merit; no objective doubt of impartiality; proper denial of motion to disqualify |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Jorden R., 293 Conn. 539 (2009) (two alternative grounds for § 17a-112(j)(1) reunification proof)
- In re Alison M., 127 Conn. App. 197 (2011) (mootness and alternative grounds in reunification analysis)
- McKenna v. Delente, 123 Conn. App. 137 (2010) (review of motions to disqualify for judicial impartiality)
